When it arises between feeling and reason. Internal Conflict: Feelings vs. Reason

Yes, there is no conflict between reason and feelings.

Conflict is between opposing desires. For example, I want to meet a girl - and I want to avoid shame (she can refuse).

Feelings signal our needs.

In our example - a feeling of erotic arousal and a feeling of fear.

If I poorly recognize the MIXTURE of my feelings and desires (and I don’t understand that it is ALWAYS a mixture!), then I will THINK that I have ONE desire (need) - to get to know each other.

But when moving towards a girl, my feelings will clearly prosemaphore to me that no, no, you cho! - there is a desire (need) to avoid shame, and wow!

And then it seems that this is a dispute between reason and feeling.

No. It is a conflict of two needs, one of which was poorly understood.

Here everything is clearly divided into what is innate and what is acquired by us as an object in the process of education. Why do cats love to be stroked, is it not because they have in their memory communication with a mother cat who washed them with her tongue and surrounded them with warmth? Here is a child chasing pigeons, pulling a cat's tail, pulling her older sister's hair, etc. There are two explanations for the situation and two developments. Either those around (by reasoning: "he is still small, does not understand anything"; or it is so convenient for me - "whatever the child amuses himself, if only he does not cry and distract from communication with friends and guests") do not stop, do not stop the child's activities or stop. If condoned and encouraged, the child perceives that chasing and hurting another is associated with general fun and a good attitude towards me, and his own positive emotions object of education. Here the child is injured, and the subject of upbringing (older sister, brother or parent), as it seems to him, doing a more important thing, beats the "culprit" of the fall and bruise in order to calm the person suffering from the bruise. There is no time to realize - it is more important to calm and distract from pain - other consequences of such an educational impact: the child remembers (programmed) for life that you need to hit someone so that you yourself feel better. Including libido is formed mainly in the process of personality education.

Whatever happens to a person, in a person there is a comparison and comparison of what is observed and analyzed in reality with that mental image based on the associativity of thinking, the image that was formed in the process of education.

For example, a dislike for mathematics can form, although a person “forgot” about it long ago, when a mother or father told a 3-4 year old child, when he caught them doing accounting calculations, that, they say, don’t bother your son (daughter), it’s true tiring, I'm tired/tired here. They gave, for example, an abacus so that the child would not be distracted, and the child went to ride on big abacus with knuckles. I myself saw this episode with friends.

I see it a little differently than Eugene (with all due respect to him). The conflict of mind and feelings is a confrontation between two primary principles, two components of the dual universe - light and darkness, heaven and earth, spirituality and matter - where the first corresponds to the mind, and the second to feelings. Consider the example of the same girl, but add for clarity the moment that we are already married and have children. Reason in this situation argues that close communication with a beautiful girl is a detrimental and destructive step, which, having brought short pleasure, will turn into long-term problems. Reason may suggest that such behavior is destructive not only to my personal relationships and well-being, but also to society as a whole. Since a society where betrayal and debauchery flourish is much less stable and viable. All these are very strong arguments to nip in the bud any possible communication with strangers. For the mind.

Not for feelings. Feelings are dominated by instincts - our natural component, what we have in common with any forest animal. Guided only by instincts, mankind would have achieved absolutely nothing. People, like animals, would only consume food, copulate, fight each other, and try to survive. The development of humanity as a whole, and of man in particular, begins where reason takes precedence over instinct, over feeling, turning it from a master into a servant. A society where reason reigns develops. A society where feelings reign is degrading. This does not mean that development implies dryness and insensitivity, since it is also not reasonable to completely reject what we feel, our bestial nature. It is, and will be, regardless of our desires. It is wise to understand this, accept it, and not let it take over.

Composition of the exam

Feelings fill our life with experiences, emotions, make it brighter, and the mind cools them so that a person is not guided in his life by feelings alone. Being in balance, these two opposing forces provide a harmonious state of mind. But often it happens that there is a conflict between feelings and reason. This happens most often when love arises in the soul of a person. It is this conflict that is described by I.S. Turgenev in the novel "Fathers and Sons".

The protagonist of this work, Yevgeny Bazarov, was a staunch nihilist. He denied the romantic feeling of love, called it "rubbish, unforgivable nonsense." The hero did not believe in love, denied its existence, argued that it was all “romanticism” or “nonsense”, that there was only physiology or “the need of the body”. “And what is the mysterious relationship between a man and a woman?”

But here on life path Bazarova meets Anna Sergeevna Odintsova, who completely changes the hero’s attitude to feelings, strong changes take place in him. Yevgeny Bazarov could not even imagine that he would be capable of deep and strong love. I.S. Turgenev draws the hero’s inner struggle with himself, he cannot cope with the feeling that has arisen: “he would easily cope with his blood, but something else has moved into him.” Love and romanticism, at which Bazarov laughed so caustically, capture the hero as a whole, shake his nihilistic convictions, which seemed so indestructible at the beginning of the novel. He even turns out to be able to feel the beauty of a summer night, its freshness, mystery during a meeting with Odintsova.

But Odintsova did not truly love Bazarov. For her, her way of life and comfort were more precious. In all her actions, she is guided only by reason, completely subordinating her feelings to him, pre-calculates all her actions, choosing only those that can cause a minimum of emotional unrest. She chose a calm path that does not bring joy, but does not make her suffer either. Behind the serene calmness and measured existence of the heroine lies her spiritual coldness, inability to hobbies, indifference, selfishness.

Because of love for Odintsova, a conflict arose in the soul of Evgeny Bazarov between reason and feeling. To distract himself, Eugene leaves for his parents, begins to help his father in his medical practice, but, accidentally injuring his finger during the autopsy of a patient with typhus, falls ill and dies. Bazarov leaves love in the world, not hatred or nihilism. The conflict that has taken place in his soul unexpectedly leads him to “eternal reconciliation” with “endless life”.

And in the novel by L.N. Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" describes the conflict between reason and feeling that arose because of Anna Karenina's love for Vronsky, ending in the death of the heroine. She, like Yevgeny Bazarov, was unable to resist her strong feeling. But, if Odintsova did not want to allow herself to respond to the feelings of Eugene Onegin, then Karenina's love was mutual, but this did not lead her to happiness.

The heroine N.M. did not resist her feelings either. Karamzin "Poor Lisa", who fell in love with the rich nobleman Erast. She responded to his feelings without thinking about anything. But, unfortunately, the feelings of the young noble soon cooled. He went on a military campaign, where he lost all his fortune, as a result of which he was forced to marry a rich widow. Lisa could not stand the betrayal of Erast. For the girl, the act of a loved one was such a strong blow, she was unable to cope with her mental pain and threw herself into the pond to die. Ardent feelings led Liza to death and brought grief to her mother.

Apparently, when feelings win in a conflict with reason, this does not bring happiness to a person.

September
2016

Yes, there is no conflict between reason and feelings.

Conflict is between opposing desires. For example, I want to meet a girl - and I want to avoid shame (she can refuse).

Feelings signal our needs.

In our example - a feeling of erotic arousal and a feeling of fear.

If I poorly recognize the MIXTURE of my feelings and desires (and I don’t understand that it is ALWAYS a mixture!), then I will THINK that I have ONE desire (need) - to get to know each other.

We think, "Oh heavens, she might bite me," not, "Oh heavens, it's terrible that she's irrational." Is the invocation of irrationality an improvement, or, as it seems, a simple gesture - impoverishment, which clarifies interesting textures or certain steps towards individual cases of vice and virtue? Of course, we will move like Sally's mind in the best ways. We would like Molly's torment to guide her more reliably on her way back than is evident now. We have familiar methods of persuasion and argumentation.

Do you want Molly to do the same to you? we might ask. Maybe Sally didn't mind having her toes on the board, but Molly could do anything that reciprocally played her bagpipes, which annoys Sally. Sally, of course, will not like it. Hopefully, thinking about it will motivate you to stop. She can bet on Molly's kindness and forgiveness not to play her harmonica, or keep her parents if she does. Or she can wait for Molly to play her harmonica so she can feel uncomfortable first.

But when moving towards a girl, my feelings will clearly prosemaphore to me that no, no, you cho! - there is a desire (need) to avoid shame, and wow!

And then it seems that this is a dispute between reason and feeling.

No. It is a conflict of two needs, one of which was poorly understood.

Complain

September
2016

Here everything is clearly divided into what is innate and what is acquired by us as an object in the process of education. Why do cats love to be stroked, is it not because they have in their memory communication with a mother cat who washed them with her tongue and surrounded them with warmth? Here is a child chasing pigeons, pulling a cat's tail, pulling her older sister's hair, etc. There are two explanations for the situation and two developments. Either those around (by reasoning: "he is still small, does not understand anything"; or it is so convenient for me - "whatever the child amuses himself, if only he does not cry and distract from communication with friends and guests") do not stop, do not stop the child's activities or stop. If condoned and encouraged, the child perceives that chasing and hurting another is associated with general fun and a good attitude towards me, and the object’s own positive emotions of upbringing. Here the child is injured, and the subject of upbringing (older sister, brother or parent), as it seems to him, doing a more important thing, beats the "culprit" of the fall and bruise in order to calm the person suffering from the bruise. There is no time to realize - it is more important to calm and distract from pain - other consequences of such an educational impact: the child remembers (programmed) for life that you need to hit someone so that you yourself feel better. Including libido is formed mainly in the process of personality education.

She could even beat Molly in a fight. Maybe she knows she might have to pay for the fun later, but she still thinks being naughty is irresistible now. Thus, we might try to rub Sally's nose into Molly's anguish, hoping to activate empathy or compassion, and thus remorse and a better state of mind. But perhaps we will fail; after all, it was Molly's perspective of anguish that animated Sally's pranks in the first place.

So we leave with a shake of our heads. She doesn't respect the law. She doesn't have a heart in the right place. But is his head in the right place? Faced with this, Sally's understanding is impeccable. She knows exactly what she is doing and why she is doing it. Now to suggest that it is the head that is wrong seems to be just a professional deformity that affects moral philosophers, not a road open to new proofs of Sally's wrongness, or new treatments to bring her back to the straight and narrow. It was in this sense that Bernard Williams mocked the fiery thrust of moral philosophy: "an argument that will stop them in their tracks when they come to take him away."

An area of problem where my proposal fits well is the "authority" of the mind, a problem that some writers have encountered in Yuman's proposals on motivation and desire. In an influential article on the subject, Warren Quinn argued that this is not a major issue among rationalists such as himself and "subjectivists" or "non-cognitivists".

The breadboard might explain how I do, but by itself can't do anything to connect radios randomly to anything reasonable. And, rejecting any attempt to call states of a higher order, such as pros or cons, which are relevant to this first order of disposition. To help us with this problem, he comes to the conclusion that dispositions by themselves, such as the desire to try to get things or to feel pain towards things, do not "rationalize" choice.

Complain

September
2016

Even the average choice for certain purposes is not rationalized, unless the ends themselves. Only a true knowledge of the objects of choice as "good" could do this. Parfit enthusiastically follows the same line. It seems strange to say that movement, in the sense of, for example, eating a piece of pie, is not "rationalized" by my hunger; so we need to take a closer look at this line of thinking. First, what movement of mind is in question? One suggestion would be that it is an awareness of the desire of striving to satisfy it.

When considering desire, we are usually not self-reflective, taking as our starting point a fact about ourselves. Instead, we accept a fact about our situation. Our desires are manifest functional states in relation between the fact perceived and the tendency to act resulting from it. Like the desire for food, hunger manifests itself in the way the tendency to solve problems with pies is guided by the consciousness that is announced. So, is there a desire to “rationalize” the trend? This explains why, no matter how one talks about location, one can say that we explain their manifestations.

Final essay

in the thematic direction "Mind and feeling »

Mind and feeling ... What is it? These are the two most important forces

components inner world each person. Both of these forces

equally need each other.

The mental organization of a person is very complex. situations that

But Quinn is actually right when he says that this alone does not indicate whether a movement of the mind is good or bad, admirable or despicable, and therefore does not fund the assessment of the conversation in terms of reason or rationality. However, all of this shows that Quinn's petition - this desire is to confirm or rationalize the choice - was completely wrong. The entry of a company that claims that the movement of the mind was good or "rational" offers another business.

To do this, we must turn back and see if the movement can be adapted to any practice in the field that is approved, or at least share, understanding or acceptance, as immunity from criticism. Obsessive, eccentric desire, like the tendency to turn off radios, is useless and potentially expensive and annoying. Therefore, we are far from willing to keep the mind moving - from the consciousness of an unconnected radio to the motivation to connect it - which exhibits compulsion.

happen and happen to us, there are very different.

One of them is when our feelings prevail over reason. For another

situation is characterized by the predominance of reason over feelings. It also happens

the third, when a person has harmony, this means that the mind and

Feelings have exactly the same effect on the mental organization of a person.

Quinn may have thought that if private desires cannot be rationalized, then nothing in our cognitive dispositions taken as a whole can. The picture is that in Yumen's world "normativity" is bleached from the outside. This would be a dangerous form of argument, the weakness of which is more familiar from discussions of coherence and fundamentalism that apply to cognitive states. While many authors agree that a belief cannot be verified, they tend to believe that adhering to a sufficiently consistent set can do so.

The theme of reason and feeling is interesting for many writers. Reading

works of the world fiction, including

Russian, we meet many such examples that tell us about

manifestation different situations in the life of artistic heroes

works, when an internal conflict occurs: feelings act

Or, if things other than beliefs can enter the justification pool, they can include things like processes and actions, such as the involvement of perceptual processes in a causal interaction with the world, or the experience resulting from such a commitment. If one begins to paint a satisfying picture of cognitive justification - which is best done because it's really the only game in town - then parallel history can do the parallel work of practice activities by first referring to the entire matrix of surrounding dispositions and then potentially referring to that one's experience. how these provisions stand the test of time when they are tested in human practice.

against reason. Literary heroes very often find themselves in front of

choice between the dictates of the senses and the prompting of the mind.

So, in the story of Nikolai Mikhailovich Karamzin "Poor Lisa" we see

how the nobleman Erast falls in love with a poor peasant girl Lisa. Lisa

Confusion, sadness, crazy joy, anxiety, despair, shock -

This set provides the only judgment that one wish can face. In other words, although we may be outside of any particular desire or inclination and consider its goodness in the light of other desires and dispositions taken as a whole, there is no process to stand behind them all at once, no more, it is not true. Someone with Quinn's guidance might try to say that while it's "just for us", it might only tell us what we really appreciate, not what matters. But little is gained by vilifying the only methods we use, or we could use.

these are the feelings that overwhelmed the girl's heart. Erast, weak and

windy, cooled off to Lisa, he doesn’t think about anything, reckless

Human. Satiation sets in and the desire to get rid of the bored

A moment of love is beautiful, but reason gives long life and strength to feelings.

Lisa hopes to regain her lost happiness, but all in vain. deceived into

To insist on a split between "fact" and "value" at this time would not be like defending the autonomy of the normative world, like becoming, on the one hand, immune to attention, and on the other, not without conceivable interest. These are, in fact, only the illusions of philosophers, and not the values and norms that are bleached from the world of Hume.

However, contemporary enthusiasm for causes indicates that, in many minds, the replacement of the sovereignty of good with the sovereignty of causes is not only a change in language, but also a change in regime. This opens the way to a new dawn of philosophy, a new retreat, and new philosophical territory to occupy and explore. It is therefore important to consider the view that as we move into the territory of the mind, we are actually moving. However, in this application, this question is not revealed between goodness and some natural property, but between reason and goodness.

best hopes and feelings, she forgets her soul and throws herself into the pond

near the Simonov Monastery. The girl trusts the movements of her heart, lives

only "gentle passions." For Lisa, the loss of Erast is tantamount to the loss

life. Fervor and ardor bring her. to death.

Reading the story of N. M. Karamzin, we are convinced that “mind and

How can there be a problem, for example, as to whether reason can sometimes demand God's sacrifice in favor of competing candidates, such as self-interest? How can we be concerned if reason is on the side of caution and self-interest, or on the side of justice, benevolence, or the common good? The question is very real, and it fertilizes the concept of reason as a special type of power, an autonomous normative structure, magnificent enough to be used to measure and analyze even the right claims of virtue.

feelings are two forces equally in need of each other.

In the novel by Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy, one can find several scenes and

episodes related to the topic.

Favorite heroine of L. N. Tolstoy, Natasha Rostova met and fell in love

Prince Andrei Bolkonsky. After the departure of Prince Andrei abroad, Natasha

I was very sad for a long time without leaving my room. She is very lonely

Because just as "sentient" and their clans are general terms of praise, among other terms as such, they can subscribe to a specific cast. They may be limited to compliments within a subset of possible dimensions. This happens whenever you talk about "good" or "good" and as we are talking about wealth reasons, economic reasons, health reasons, personal reasons, or strategic reasons.

Therefore, it is not necessary for a prince to actually have all the qualities mentioned above, but it is necessary that they appear to him. Thus, you must remain pure, faithful, humane, honest, religious - and be so, but with the condition in which you are attuned, when necessary, not beings, so that you know how to become different. The prince, we can say, sometimes has great reasons to behave cruelly, inhumanly, disloyally and in bad faith. In short, he must behave badly. The dimension in which an apology is given is simply a matter of self-interest, stability, or survival; and Machiavelli are known to believe that when they compete with conventional kindness, they not only achieve the real behavior of men, as is necessary for them.

loved one. In these difficult days, Anatole meets in her life

Kuragin. He looked at Natasha "admired, affectionate

with a glance." The girl was recklessly carried away by Anatole. Natasha's love

Andrea was put to the test. Not keeping this promise

wait for a loved one, she betrayed him. A young girl is too young and

Here, what the prince has more reason for is not what is best: the movement of the mind that is praised can be cunning, deceitful, insidious and inhuman. It must be in order to survive. The fact is that the cunning and strategic movement of the mind is indeed commendable. And if we think about it, it always is. Whenever one describes a potential conflict between reason and virtue, one finds that causes are limited to one dimension.

The question is even broader, more human. Persistent requests for this dimension should be limited to conscientiousness or benevolence. Therefore, we can open the question of whether good is always something reasonable. Not because reason is an autonomous legislator at some indefinite distance from good, whose precepts have their own authority, but because these precepts are contrary to the precepts of virtue or obligation. We open it, for example, when we worry directly or indirectly about the old and uncomfortable conflict between self-interest and the merits of considering another.

inexperienced in matters of the heart. But a pure soul tells her that she

behaves badly. Why did Rostova fall in love with Kuragin? She saw in him

someone close to her. This love story ended very sadly:

Natasha tried to poison herself, but remains alive.

The girl passionately repents for this before God, asks him to give

her peace of mind and happiness. L. N. Tolstoy himself considered history

relations between Natasha and Anatole "the most important place of the novel." Natasha

should be happy, as she has tremendous power of life and love.

What conclusion can be drawn from this topic? Remembering the pages

works of N. M. Karamzin and L. N. Tolstoy, I come to the conclusion that

that in both works we see an internal human conflict:

feelings oppose reason. No deep moral sense

"A man cannot have either love or honor." How are they related

mind and feeling? I would like to quote the words of the Russian writer M.M.

Prishvin: “There are feelings that replenish and obscure the mind, but there are

mind that cools the movement of the senses.

The inner world of a person is filled with such components as reason and feeling. These are completely opposite concepts. Reason is the fruit of numerous analyses, evaluative activities. Feeling is an emotional reflection of reality that occurs instantly. Are reason and feeling always in harmony with each other? How often does a person listen to the call of reason when he is overwhelmed with emotions? Or does he act according to his heart's desire? Why is a person forced to make this most difficult choice? What is causing this fight? What will it lead to? Is it possible for a person, guided by one thing, to reach incredible heights, to make a great discovery? Or will it lead to the collapse of the human soul, the destruction of the former foundations of life and the entire inner world of man? The answers to these questions have been sought by the great minds of mankind for many years.

Let us turn to the works of world fiction in order to understand the reasons for which there is a conflict between reason and feeling.

As an example, I would like to cite the work of Alexander Ivanovich Kuprin "Garnet Bracelet". Here we can observe the internal struggle that took place in the soul of the main character - Zheltkov. He, a man of humble origin, is madly in love with Princess Sheina. But she is a married woman. Zheltkov understands that they can never be together, but his feelings have such significant power over him that he writes letters to Sheina about his love. She rejects him and asks him not to bother her anymore. Zheltkov realizes that life without a loved one is impossible, she has lost her meaning, so he decides to leave this world.

Here is an example of how a hero, finding himself in the center of a confrontation between mind and feelings, unable to resist this struggle, he decides to die. After all, his heart wanted one thing, but his mind repeated something completely different.

As another example, I would like to cite William Shakespeare's tragedy Romeo and Juliet. The main characters belong to two warring families - the Montagues and the Capulets. Young people experience strong feelings, they are madly in love with each other. However, life circumstances do not allow them to be together, everything is against the feelings of lovers. The voice of reason insists that they do not succumb to the outbreak of love. But emotions prevail in the fight against the mind. Unfortunately, the fates of Romeo and Juliet are sad, they both die. This is how the life of people who gave preference to feelings can end tragically.

Conflicts in our life come very often. The struggle of reason and feeling is a serious confrontation. It occurs when a person needs to right choice to decide on something. A person must weigh all the pros and cons so as not to make a mistake when choosing. After all, the whole future life is curled from it.

Theme of the essay: "Reason and feelings are two forces that equally need each other." V.G. Belinsky.

What is mind? Sobriety of thought, calculation, reason, cold heart? What is a feeling? Passion, emotion, momentary passion or a higher spiritual impulse?

According to the critic Belinsky, "mind and feelings are two forces that equally need each other." And you can't help but agree with him. Reason and feeling are dependent on each other, very closely intertwined, it is impossible to break the thin thread between them.

There are situations in a person's life when feeling prevails over reason. As folk wisdom says, "if you fall in love with something, the mind will retreat." It is impossible to say for sure whether this is good or bad. This can lead to both a happy ending and a very sad one.
This happened to the heroine of Kuprin's story "Olesya". The girl fell in love without memory and gave herself to this feeling with her head. Although she knew perfectly well what this would lead to, she knew that a sad outcome was inevitable, but the feeling at that moment prevailed over reason. She did not regret for a second that she had allowed her mind to recede, as she experienced true happiness. Such happiness, which not everyone in life is given to experience.
Is it good when the mind prevails over the feelings? A question to which there is no clear answer. You can not show your feelings and remain unhappy, while making unhappy and the one you love. For what? Does it make sense?

In Pushkin's novel "Eugene Onegin" feeling and reason collided several times. The first - when "the mind retreated" and Tatyana, succumbing to her first deep feeling, confessed her love to Eugene, which at that time was unacceptable for a girl. Her attempt was in vain. For Eugene, she was just a child, and he considered that her fire of love would go out as quickly as it caught fire. How could he imagine that years later he would be in her place. But Tatyana appears to us far from being a little girl. She had learned by this time to manage her feelings with the help of common sense. Despite her love for Eugene, she remained faithful to the man who loved her. Was she happily married? I think not completely, because I loved another. Was Eugene happy? Again, I don't think it's complete. After all, if it was true love, then reason only made it worse.

Guided only by reason, you can remain unhappy for the rest of your life. Guided only by feelings, you can get into situations after which unbearable mental pain will remain forever. It turns out that the mind and feelings need each other and it is very difficult to live guided by one thing.

Internal conflict: mind versus feelings.

First you need to understand what feelings and reason are. These are two important forces of the inner world of a person, which very often conflict. There are situations when feelings prevail over the mind and a person becomes unable to control himself, but sometimes the mind takes over. When discussing the topic of mind and feelings, one wonders whether these two forces should be in harmony. And in literary works we can see this conflict and understand it well.

Recall the work of Kuprin "Garnet Bracelet". It tells us about the unrequited love of a stranger for Princess Vera Nikolaevna. Zheltkov, the same stranger, a common person who lived with a feeling of love for Vera Nikolaevna. Zheltkov understood that he would never be with Vera, she had a husband, but even the fact that she simply received his letters was enough for him, he did not even expect an answer from her. But time passed when he was forbidden to write to her, forbidden to do what he lived for. And he decides to commit suicide. All his feelings overshadow the mind, and he can not cope with himself or with his feelings.
The situation is similar in Karamzin's Poor Liza. main character- poor peasant woman Lisa falls in love with a young man Erast. And it seems that their love will never end. Lisa completely surrenders to her feelings, but the young nobleman cools off and goes on a military campaign, where he loses all his fortune and is forced to marry a rich widow. For Lisa, this becomes the strongest blow, she is going through heartache, but does not cope with it, jumps into the pond. The mind fails to master the feelings, and Lisa makes a huge mistake.

You may be interested