For several recent years social science is confidently leading among elective subjects, because by adding good USE scores in Russian and mathematics to this certificate, you can confidently apply to various universities in the country in such areas as: law (the USE in history is also required); psychology and pedagogy; sociology; media communications; hotel business; publishing.

Despite the apparent "simplicity" and clarity compared to other sciences, social science is not the easiest way to earn the desired points.

Recently, tasks for “logic” (with the choice of option) have been removed from the options, and now all that simplicity has evaporated. Therefore, avoid such a negligent attitude, prepare in advance. And do not forget that the competition in universities in areas where the main subject is social science is always the highest.

USE dates in social studies in 2020

The exact dates of the exam are determined by the Ministry of Education at the end of the year, while it is possible to guess when the exam in social science will be in 2020.

• Early period: April 4, 2020
• Main period: June 14, 2020

Social Studies Essays in 2020

Essay topics are not revealed until conducting the exam in Social Studies in 2020. Teachers and students will learn the exact topics at the time of printing out the assignment envelope on the exam itself.

But there are indicative essay topics that cover the problems of the main five topics. When preparing for the exam in social studies in 2020, you can focus on these topics. This document can be downloaded and viewed on your computer in pdf format.

Preparation for the exam in social studies-2019

Materials for CMM

It is extremely important to choose sensible textbooks for preparation. FIPI specialists have their own preferences: they recommend preparing based on L.N. Bogolyubov and A.I. Kravchenko. It is possible and necessary to discuss, express one's point of view at other times and in other places: at lessons, disputes, in a friendly company. The exam requires knowledge to be shown. Although in some issues there is an opportunity to reflect, to express one's point of view. Such a chance will be in writing an essay. Calmly, slowly choose a topic. An essay is a good chance to get extra points.

Specialists from FIPI say that the first thing you should pay attention to when preparing is knowledge and understanding of the terms of such disciplinary blocks as economics, philosophy, law, sociology and political science. Very often, the student cannot solve the task correctly, because he does not relate it to a certain scientific field, using the wrong method of analysis.

Social science includes "squeezed" from several disciplines, such as psychology, law, political science, sociology, economics, philosophy. Experts believe that the main stumbling block in exams in this subject is the blurring of students' ideas, fuzzy knowledge of terminology.

How to write an essay on social studies. Plan.

Once you have an idea of ​​the essay topics, you can practice writing. Essays are written according to a single plan, the content varies depending on the topic.

The mini essay should have the following structure:

Working through each topic from the modules "Philosophy", "Social Psychology", "Sociology", "Economics", "Political Science" and "Jurisprudence", you must:

• understand the essence of the problem;
• pick up a quote
• build a logical chain of reasoning;
• find arguments;
• give examples.

To facilitate work on the structure of a mini-essay, you can use ready-made clichés. Sample Plan a social studies essay applicable to any topic in 2020 would look like:

Of course, this is only a basic template that needs to be supplemented and expanded using your own thoughts, knowledge base, thoughts and statements that you can refer to, as well as experience (you can use your own, but better described in textbooks).

For the majority of graduates who chose the USE in social studies in 2020, making a plan for an essay is not a problem.

It is useful to use the advice of practitioners on writing an essay:

• Remember - you are not required to have a long and meaningless text, but a concise reasoning supported by facts.
• Do not go away from the main idea, periodically returning to it at different points in the essay.
• Do not forget to mention a few words about the author of the statement used in the essay.
• Avoid statements and judgments that are not related to the given topic.
• Try to describe all existing views on the problem under consideration, considering all possible ways to solve it.

Attention! The main criterion for evaluating an essay is the correspondence to the given topic and the completeness of the disclosure of the issue. If the commission decides that the essay is off topic, it will be evaluated at 0 points.

On the Internet you can find videos on writing an essay on social studies. In 2020, they will also be relevant, the advice and the principle of preparation are universal.

About 50% of schoolchildren in their senior year opt for the Unified State Examination in Social Studies in 2019 as an optional subject for delivery. In part, the guys believe that this is an easy discipline, other teenagers need a subject in order to score a certain number of points and go to university. Naturally, there are pitfalls here, you need to prepare well, study new directions, and also focus on complex topics in order to get a decent number of points as a result.

What is related to the exam?

Surely no one will deny that we are talking about an ambiguous subject. The reviews of teenagers turned out to be contradictory, respectively, you need to figure everything out gradually. The first reason for choosing social science is the popularity of the direction, the second reason is hopelessness, sometimes a misunderstanding of where to go in the potential future. The simplest solution is to pass such an exam, but believe me, this is not always a justified choice.

Removed from exam some time ago logical questions, where you could just stop at some option, from now on, all simplicity has sunk into oblivion. Accordingly, it is rational not to be negligent about the test, moreover, carefully prepare for it. In no case do not ignore the fact that the competitive basis in universities, where social science is an important subject, is unambiguously high.

Temporarily, nothing is known about the dates for the potential year, but, if we are guided by the practice of past years, the main and reserve stages are carried out from mid-spring to early summer.

What are the secrets and innovations?

The exam lasts almost 4 hours, in the allotted time you will have to make an effort to answer 29 questions, it is desirable that they be correct. During preparation, it is not necessary to rely on the recommendations of previous years, as they are updated periodically. The main innovation lies in the fact that from now on, at a minimum test items when earlier it was possible to choose 1 answer from the provided options, moreover, there was a high probability of guessing.

Now the tasks are divided into groups and blocks, in particular, by topic, this simplifies the search for the required answer. There are also new system, it is necessary to take into account the primary and secondary scores. Once all tasks are completed, the teenager receives the full 62 points.

In addition, special points are added for the quality of the answer. There are tasks with a simple answer, as well as those that provide argumentation of a point of view, plus an essay. For answers to standard tasks, it is available to earn 1-3 points, and another 5 primary points that are due for writing short essay, it also has evaluation criteria.

What issues should be given more attention?

During the passage of the tests presented in the tickets, questions are provided, distributed in blocks, in particular:

• a section where it is important to demonstrate an understanding of the interaction, connection, complexities in social groups. Also take into account the understanding of the algorithm for the development of society, it is rational to demonstrate how well a teenager understands conflict aspects;
• then we will talk about a person in society, the questions of the section return to the history of the biosocial development of citizens, as a result, it will be possible to understand their place in modern world. The student must show that he knows a lot about the details of society, understood the most important principles of the functioning of society, moreover, he must determine his personal place in it;
• of course, it does not do without politics, the structure of the country in the dynamics of prosperity, its current state, various kinds of regimes, management institutions, the essence of statehood and other nuances of the topic that are little known, should also be understood;
• legal aspects will be affected, the answers in the section provide for specific data, knowledge from the sphere of the country's legislation, plus it is important to be able to operate with legal terms;
• Finally, questions on economics should be answered, here not only knowledge of the theory in the field of a market economy is demonstrated, but also the ability to analyze, read charts, and predetermine the main economic indicators.

Summing up, it becomes clear that each ticket is designed for 29 questions, they are divided into blocks. For 20 tasks from 1 block, simple answers should be given, sometimes these are words, numbers or phrases. Part of the questions are designed for a minimum level of knowledge, but some require excellent preparation of teenagers. For the first part of the exam, it is most realistic to score 35 points.

The next block includes 9 questions, detailed answers will also be presented there. Be sure to pay attention to 21-22 tasks, they are of a basic type, then there are questions of increased complexity, in particular, an essay. There are 5 themes to choose from. For the designated part of the exam, 29 points are required.

How to prepare properly?

It is definitely important to decide on sensible literature, FIPI representatives on the official portal give some recommendations. At the exam, only knowledge should be shown, and it was possible to argue and discuss only in the classroom. Sometimes questions give a chance to reflect, to express a personal opinion. There is a similar opportunity in the essay, the main thing is to choose a topic based on how you could open it, this allows you to rely on highest mark.

Teachers often said that it was important not only to know the terminology, but also to understand it. Often a child cannot give the correct answer, because he does not see the connection with a particular scientific field, and use the wrong one. analytical method. The described discipline covers several areas, but the main difficulty is the blurred representation of adolescents on many topics.

Recently, the public has been vehemently discussing the issue of passing the Unified State Exam. Someone proposes to abolish this format of knowledge assessment and resume the exam system, as in Soviet times. And someone thinks that the USE is a great opportunity to show students their knowledge, gaining the right number of points, to enter prestigious higher educational establishments, even residents of provincial towns.

Until now, graduates had to take two compulsory subjects - Russian and mathematics. In addition to these disciplines, the student can choose additional exams, points for which are necessary for studying at the university.

Many students in grade 11 plan to connect their lives with the legal, social, economic or legal field of activity. In this regard, as an additional subject, they also need to take an exam in social studies. It is important for them to know what changes will be made to the procedure for passing the exam in social studies in 2019, as well as the latest FIPI news.

Who is required to take the exam in social studies

Knowledge testing, regardless of changes in the Unified State Exam in social studies in 2019, as well as the latest FIPI news, is necessary for those graduates who plan to master an economic or legal profession.

To successfully pass the discipline, you must score a minimum number of points - 70. Only with hard work and preparation for certification, you can get such a good result.

USE in social studies in 2019

It is quite difficult to take social studies because this subject involves knowledge of a huge number of terms, concepts and scientific information. This discipline includes several humanitarian subjects:

• right;


• economy;


• sociology;


• political science;


• philosophy.

In addition, training provides knowledge of religious, aesthetic foundations and cultural studies. Such directions have been thoroughly studied in universities for several years. For graduates, it is not necessary to have an in-depth knowledge of these sciences, it is enough to understand the basic concepts.

The structure of the exam in social science

The difficult moments in the delivery of social studies include part A, which provides for a tricky task. Answering the questions in this block can take a lot of time, and not even all teachers will be able to find a solution. Usually, the answer has a double meaning.

The main difficult moment for an examinee in the subject of social science is considered to be a huge number of competitors. After all, there are 10 times more people who want to be certified in this discipline than those who plan to take mathematical subjects.

There are several documents that are the basis for preparatory stage social studies certifications.

1. specifier.


2. Codifier.


3. Demo version.

The specification tells about the number of tasks. So, there are 29 of them in the exam:

• 1 part - 20 tasks;


• Part 2 - 9 tasks.

USE duration

The maximum initial number of points that can be earned:

• in the first part - 35 points;


• in the second part - 29 points.

The codifier contains a list of legal documents to be studied for each examinee in social studies. Documents include:

1. the Constitution of the Russian Federation;


2. Some chapters of the Civil Code;


3. Some chapters of the Family Code;


4. Some chapters of the Labor Code;


5. Code of Administrative Offenses;


6. Federal Law on Citizenship;


7. Law on military service and others.

This documentation must be carefully studied for the successful passing of the exam and obtaining excellent results.

Demo Options Unified Exam are intended to familiarize you with the approximate tasks that will be indicated directly on the exam itself in KIM.

In order for the student to clearly understand the rules for completing tasks in the second part, which provides for a full answer, it is necessary to carefully study the procedure for applying the criteria for evaluating answers to exam answers.

Also, in the task where two question marks are written, two answers are provided.

Social Studies Unified State Examination

Dates of the Unified State Examination in Social Studies in 2019

According to the schedule for the delivery of the Unified state exam in 2019, certification in all subjects, as well as in social studies, will take place in several stages:

The early period, which will take place on Wednesday 3 April 2019. In the early period, a reserve date for passing the exam is provided - on Monday, April 8, 2019.

The main period of certification in social studies will take place on Thursday, June 13, 2019.

As in the early stage, the main period contains a reserve day for knowledge testing - Thursday, June 27, 2019.

On these days, graduates of grade 11 will be able to take the exam and, based on the results, decide what are the chances for continuing their education in higher educational institutions.

Planned changes in the exam

Changes in the Unified State Exam 2019 - latest FIPI news

The list of changes in the USE in all disciplines, including social studies in 2019, as well as the latest state certification news, is contained on the official FIPI Internet portal.

As an addition, the rules for checking the recorded answers on two forms under the corresponding tasks are included in the control and measuring materials for passing the exam.

Interesting! Changes in the exam in biology in 2019

specific changes in passing the exam in 2019 in social studies, according to the latest news, is not expected. However, teachers, as well as those who are being certified, will be able to notice several amendments. Innovative changes for the most part will affect the specification of the assignment, as well as improvements in the procedure for setting marks:

1. In task No. 25 there will be more precise wording and assessment parameters. Now, with the correct answer, they award 4 points and not, as it was before, 3.


2. In this regard, the total number of points will be not 64, but 65.


3. Transformation of the wording will also be in task No. 28 and in task No. 29.

As for the structure and content of KIM in the subject of social science, no corresponding changes are expected in the coming year.

(with extended answer)

• Correct answers to three questions - 2 points.
• Correct answers to any two questions - 1 point
• Any one question is answered correctly. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

• Correctly explained and answered two questions - 2 points.
• Any two elements of the answer are correctly given - 1 point
• Any one element of the answer is correct. OR OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

• Two sources (paths) are correctly named and 2 examples are given (total 4 examples) - 3 points.
• Two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 2-3 examples are given - 2 points.
• One or two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 1 example is given. OR 1 source (path) is correctly named and 2 examples corresponding to it are given - 1 point
• All responses that do not meet the above criteria for scoring 1, 2, and 3 points. OR Reasoning is given general that do not meet the requirements of the task. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

• Three functions are correctly named and explained - 3 points.
• Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are explained - 2 points.
• One or three functions are correctly named, one of them is explained. OR Only three functions are correctly named - 1 point
• Only one or two functions are correctly named. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

25.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the concept - 2 points

• Explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept is given completely, clearly, clearly, unambiguously: the essential features related to the characteristic are indicated this concept/ distinguishing it from other concepts (the content of the concept is correctly disclosed through the generic affiliation of the concept and its specific difference(s)) - 2 points.
• The meaning of the concept as a whole is disclosed, but in an incomplete volume: only one of the essential features relating to the characteristics of this concept / distinguishing it from other concepts is indicated, OR there are some inaccuracies / shortcomings in the answer that do not distort it in essence - 1 point
• In the answer, along with the correct ones, incorrect signs (characteristics, descriptions, comparisons, etc.) are given that distort the content of the concept in essence. OR There are no specific characteristics, essential features of the concept / only non-essential features are indicated that do not reveal the meaning of the concept. OR Other situations not provided for by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

1. Not counted: - a characteristic of a generic affiliation, repeating the concept, the meaning of which must be revealed; - as an essential characteristic, a sign already contained in the formulation of the task; - explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept through negation or only through the etymology of the word, metaphor or allegory.
2. If according to criterion 25.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the concept), 0 points are given, then according to criterion 25.2, 0 points are given.

25.2 Availability and quality of proposals containing information about various aspects of the concept - 2 points

• Two sentences have been drawn up, each of which contains information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about the aspects of the concept that meet the requirement of the task - 2 points.
• One sentence has been drawn up containing information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about any aspect of the concept in accordance with the requirement of the task - 1 point
• - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

The assessment does not count:

• sentences containing essential errors that distort the meaning of the concept and / or its individual aspects;
• proposals that reveal relevant aspects at the household level, without involving social science knowledge;
• phrases, uncommon sentences.

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

• Three functions are correctly named and illustrated with examples - 3 points.
• Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are illustrated with examples - 2 points.
• One to three functions are correctly named, one of them is illustrated by example(s) - 1 point
• Only one or three functions are correctly named. OR Any number of examples are given without specifying functions. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

• The sphere, type of stratification and three criteria are correctly indicated - 3 points.
• The sphere, type of stratification and one or two criteria are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and three criteria are correctly indicated - 2 points.
• The scope and type of stratification are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and one or two criteria are correctly indicated - 1 point
• Only the sphere is correct. OR The scope is not specified (incorrectly specified), regardless of the presence of other elements of the answer. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

28.1 Disclosure of the topic on the merits - 3 points

• A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Both of these "obligatory" points are detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 3 points.
• A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Only one of these "obligatory" points is detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 2 points.
• A complex plan contains at least three points, including only one point, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. This "mandatory" clause is detailed in sub-clauses, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 1 point
• All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points. OR Cases when the graduate's answer in form does not meet the requirements of the task (for example, it is not drawn up in the form of a plan with points and sub-points highlighted) - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

1. Paragraphs/subparagraphs that are abstract and formal in nature and do not reflect the specifics of the topic are not counted in the assessment.
2. If criterion 28.1 scores 0, then criterion 28.2 scores 0

28.2 Correctness of wording of paragraphs and subparagraphs of the plan - 1 point

• The wording of the points and sub-points of the plan is correct and does not contain errors, inaccuracies - 1
• All other situations 0

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

29.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the statement - 1 point.

• The meaning of the statement is revealed: one or more main ideas related to the content of the social science course are correctly identified and / or one or more theses are formulated in the context of the statement, which (s) requires (s) substantiation - 1 point
• The meaning of the statement is not disclosed: not a single main idea is singled out / not a single thesis is formulated. OR The highlighted idea, the formulated thesis do not reflect the meaning of the statement / the meaning of the statement was replaced by general reasoning (“homemade”) that does not reflect the specifics of the proposed statement. OR The disclosure of the meaning is replaced by a direct retelling / paraphrasing of the given statement / a consistent explanation of each word in the statement without explaining the meaning of the statement as a whole - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

• If according to criterion 29.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the statement), 0 points are given, then 0 points are given for all other evaluation criteria.

29.2 Theoretical content of the mini-essay - 2 points.

(explanation of the key concept(s), availability and correctness of theoretical provisions)

• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) and theoretical provisions are given that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) - 2 points.
• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors), theoretical provisions are not presented. OR In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, theoretical provisions that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are given, the meaning of the key concept(s) is not disclosed. OR In the given explanations of the key concept(s) / theoretical provisions, there are certain inaccuracies that do not distort the scientific meaning of these concepts, theoretical provisions - 1 point
• All other situations not provided for by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points, including if there is no theoretical content of the mini-essay: the meaning of the key concept(s) is not explained, the theoretical provisions are not given or are not related to the main idea / the thesis, do not reveal the meaning of the statement. OR Reasonings of an everyday nature are given without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

• If criterion 29.2 scores 0, then criterion 29.3 scores 0.

29.3 Theoretical content of the mini-essay: the presence and correctness of reasoning, conclusions - 1 point.

• In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, based on the correct explanation(s) of the key concept(s), the theoretical provisions are given consistent and consistent reasoning related to each other, on the basis of which a reasonable and reliable from the point of view of scientific social science conclusion - 1 point
• All other situations, including reasoning and conclusions of an everyday nature without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

29.4 The quality of the facts and examples given - 2 points.

• At least two correct, detailed formulated facts / examples are given from various sources, confirming the illustrated idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion and not duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 2 points.
• Only one correct, detailed formulated fact/example is given, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection between this fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay. OR Correct, detailed facts/examples are given from sources of the same type, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay. OR Two examples are given from sources of different types, duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 1 point
• All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points
  0 - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

As sources, facts of public life (including media reports), personal social experience (including read books, watched movies), materials can be used. subjects(history, geography, etc.).

1. Examples from different subjects are considered as examples from different sources.
2. Facts/examples containing factual and semantic errors that led to a significant distortion of the essence of the statement or indicate a misunderstanding of the historical, literary, geographical and (or) other material used are not counted in the assessment.

Maximum score - 6

So, in KIM USE 2019 in social studies, the following changes are planned (briefly):

No changes are planned in the structure and content of the KIM USE in social studies in 2019.

The planned improvement of the wording and assessment system of tasks 25, 28 and 29 continues.

Changes in the USE 2019 in social studies (details)

Detailing the wording of the tasks is not related to the introduction of any additional requirements, its purpose is to give the USE participants the clearest idea of ​​what elements should be present in the answer to each of these tasks. Consider the new wording of task 25.

The general format for presenting a task has changed - the requirements are structured and numbered. It is absolutely obvious that the answer consists of two components: a text that reveals the meaning of the concept (it can be one or more sentences), and two sentences about certain aspects of the concept. In total, at least three sentences must be written in the answer to this task.

An important emphasis is placed on the use of social science knowledge, that is, everyday reasoning is not accepted, for example: “The teacher of social science told us that the form (source) of law is the source of law, where it originates from. He is a social scientist, and it is precisely this meaning that he invests. ”

Let us pay attention to the clearly stated requirements for the structure of sentences in clause 2): sentences must be widespread, that is, in their composition, in addition to the main members, there are secondary members of the sentence that serve to clarify and clarify the subject and predicate. In addition, word combinations will not be accepted as correct answer elements. We believe that the use of interdisciplinary links with the Russian language course will allow graduates to fulfill this requirement.

In 2019, answers to tasks 25 will be evaluated according to two criteria (the practice of evaluating answers to tasks 28 and 29 according to independent criteria confirms the effectiveness of this approach), which will make it possible to more clearly differentiate answers depending on the completeness and correctness of the disclosure of the meaning of the concept (Table 1). 3). (see document above)

The total number of participants of the main day of the main USE period in 2018 exceeded 327 thousand people, which, as in previous years, amounted to more than half of total number USE participants. Social science is the most popular exam taken by the choice of graduates, which led to the extreme heterogeneity of the level of preparation of the contingent of exam participants.

The demand for the results of the exam for admission to study in a wide range of specialties is due to the fact that the exam includes testing the foundations of socio-philosophical, economic, sociological and legal knowledge and provides for high requirements for the level of graduates' preparation (even to achieve minimum score presented high level requirements).