Sentence parsing scheme:

1. Describe the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or incentive.

2. Characterize the sentence by emotional coloring: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.

3. Describe the sentence by the presence of grammatical foundations: simple or complex

If a simple sentence:

5. Describe the proposal by the presence of the main members of the proposal: two-part or one-part, indicate which main member sentences, if it is one-part (subject or predicate).

6. Describe the proposal by the presence of secondary members of the proposal: widespread or non-common.

7. Indicate whether the sentence is complicated by something (homogeneous members, appeal, introductory words) or not complicated.

8. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech.

9. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

If a complex sentence:

5. Indicate which connection is in the proposal: allied or non-union.

6. Indicate what is the means of communication in the sentence: intonation, coordinating unions or subordinating unions.

7. Conclude what kind of sentence this is: unionless (BSP), compound (CSP), complex (CSP).

8. Disassemble each part complex sentence, as simple, starting from point No. 5 of the adjacent column.

9. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech.

10. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

An example of parsing a simple sentence:

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis:pupils and pupils study , common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.
Written review:

Narrative, non-excited, simple, two-part, g / opupils and pupils study , spread, complicated.

An example of parsing a complex sentence:

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied connection, means of communication subordinating unionbecause , a complex sentence. The first simple sentence: one-part, with the main member - the predicatedid not ask common, not complicated. Second simple sentence: two-part, grammatical basiswe went with the class, common, uncomplicated.

Written review:

Narrative, non-exclamation, complex, connection allied, medium connection sub-unionbecause , SPP.

1st PP: single composition, with main member - skaz.did not ask distribution, not complicated.

2nd PP: two-part., g / owe went with the class, distribution, no complications.

Teacher Mizhiritskaya L.S.

Punctuation marks in SSP

1. Simple sentences included compound sentence, separated by commas:

The comma is not put:

1) In BSC with unions AND, if there is a common minor member or a common subordinate clause:

2) In the SSP with the union AND, if the parts of the SSP are interrogative, exclamatory or nominal sentences:

3) In the SSP with the union AND, if there is a common introductory word:

2. If the parts of the SSP are significantly common, and have commas inside them, then they are separated from each other by a semicolon:

3. If the second part of the sentence indicates a quick change of events, a conclusion, then a dash is placed between the two parts of the sentence:

1. We write out a sentence from the text.

2. We determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement.

3. We indicate the type of emotional coloring.

4. We find grammatical foundations, we emphasize them.

5. We build a proposal scheme.

Light lighthouse rushed by over flowers and they seemed absolutely fantastic by its colour.

1) The sentence is compound, narrative, non-exclamatory.

2) The first grammatical basis - light flashed. Light- subject, expressed noun. m.r., Im. p., unit spilled- predicate, expressed by ch. past vr., will express. n., units h.

The second grammatical basis is they looked fantastic. They- subject, expressed places. 3rd sheet, pl. h. seemed fantastic- a compound nominal predicate, expressed by Ch. seemed to be the nominal part - the adjective fantastic.

3) Sentence scheme: , and .

6. Complex sentences

Complex sentences contain the main and subordinate parts, connected by a union or allied word. In the main part of the NGN, there may be descriptive words.

1. Describe the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or incentive.
2. By emotional coloring: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.
3. By the presence of grammatical foundations: simple or complex.
4. Then, depending on whether the sentence is simple or complex:

If simple: 5. Describe the sentence by the presence of the main members of the sentence: two-part or one-part, indicate which main member of the sentence, if it is one-part (subject or predicate). 6. Characterize by the presence of secondary members of the proposal: common or non-common. 7. Indicate whether the sentence is complicated by anything (homogeneous members, appeal, introductory words) or not complicated. 8. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 9. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

If difficult: 5. Indicate which connection is in the proposal: allied or non-union. 6. Indicate what is the means of communication in the sentence: intonation, coordinating unions or subordinating unions. 7. Conclude what kind of sentence this is: unionless (BSP), compound (CSP), complex (CSP). 8. Parse each part of a complex sentence as a simple one, starting from point No. 5 of the adjacent column. 9. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 10. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

An example of parsing a simple sentence

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: pupils and pupils study, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

Writing:

Narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical stem pupils and pupils study, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

An example of parsing a complex sentence

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied connection, means of communication subordinating union because, a complex sentence. The first simple sentence: one-part, with the main member - the predicate did not ask common, not complicated. Second simple sentence: two-part, grammatical basis we went with the class, common, uncomplicated.

Writing:

Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied connection, subordinating union means of communication because, SPP.

1st PP: one-part, with the main member - the predicate did not ask common, not complicated.

2nd PP: two-part, grammatical basis - we went with the class, spread, not complicated.

Schematic example (sentence followed by schema)

Another option for parsing

Syntax parsing. Order in parsing.

In phrases:

1. Select the correct phrase from the sentence.
2. We consider the structure - we highlight the main word and the dependent. We indicate what part of speech is the main and dependent word. Next, we indicate in what syntactic way this phrase is connected.
3. And finally, we denote what its grammatical meaning is.

In a simple sentence:

1. We determine what the sentence is for the purpose of the statement - narrative, incentive or interrogative.
2. We find the basis of the sentence, we establish that the sentence is simple.
3. Next, you need to talk about how this proposal is built.
   • It is two-part or one-part. If it is one-part, then determine the type: personal, impersonal, nominative or indefinitely personal.
   • Common or non-common
   • incomplete or complete. If the sentence is incomplete, then it is necessary to indicate which member of the sentence is missing in it.
4. If this proposal is complicated in any way, be it homogeneous members or isolated members of the sentence, it is necessary to note this.
5. Next, you need to analyze the sentence by members, while indicating what parts of speech they are. It is important to follow the order of parsing. First, the predicate and the subject are determined, then the secondary ones, which are part of the first - the subject, then - the predicate.
6. We explain why one way or another punctuation marks are placed in the sentence.

Predicate

1. We note what the predicate is - a simple verb or compound (nominal or verbal).
2. Specify how the predicate is expressed:
   • simple - what form of the verb;
   • compound verb - what it consists of;
   • compound nominal - what connection is used, how the nominal part is expressed.

In a sentence that has homogeneous members.

If we have a simple sentence, then when parsing it, it should be noted what kind of homogeneous members of the sentence are and how they are related to each other. Either through intonation, or intonation with conjunctions.

In sentences with separate members:

If we have a simple sentence, then when parsing it, it should be noted what the turnover will be. Next, we analyze the words that are included in this turnover by the members of the sentence.

In sentences with isolated members of speech:

First, we note that in this sentence, there is a direct speech. We indicate the direct speech and the text of the author. We analyze, explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way and not otherwise. We draw the scheme of the offer.

In a compound sentence:

First, we indicate which sentence for the purpose of the statement is interrogative, declarative or incentive. Find in the offer simple sentences, we highlight the grammatical basis in them.

We find unions with the help of which simple sentences are connected in a complex one. We note what kind of unions they are - adversative, connecting or dividing. We determine the meaning of this entire compound sentence - opposition, alternation or enumeration. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. Then each simple sentence that makes up the complex one must be parsed in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

In a complex sentence with a subordinate clause (one)

First, we indicate what the sentence is in terms of the purpose of the statement. We single out the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex one. Let's read them.

We name which sentence is the main one, and which is subordinate. We explain what kind of complex sentence it is, pay attention to how it is built, how the subordinate clause to the main clause is connected and what it refers to.

We explain why the punctuation marks in this sentence are arranged in this way. Then, the subordinate and main clauses must be parsed, in the same way as simple sentences are parsed.

In a complex sentence with subordinate clauses (several)

We call what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We single out the grammatical basis of all the simple sentences that make up the complex one, and read them out. We indicate which sentence is the main one, and which is subordinate. It is necessary to indicate what the subordination in the sentence is - either it is a parallel subordination, or sequential, or homogeneous. If there is a combination of several types of subordination, this should be noted. We explain why, in this way, punctuation marks are placed in the sentence. And, at the end, we analyze the subordinate and main clauses as simple sentences.

In a complex non-union sentence:

We call what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We find the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up this complex sentence. We read them out, call the number of simple sentences that make up the complex one. We determine what the meaning is the relationship between simple sentences. It can be - sequence, cause with effect, opposition, simultaneity, explanation or addition.

We note what are the features of the structure of this sentence, what kind of complex sentence it is. How are simple words connected in this sentence and what do they refer to.

We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way.

In a complex sentence in which there are different types of communication.

We call what, according to the purpose of the statement, this sentence is. We find and highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex one, read them out. We establish that this proposal will be a proposal in which there are different types connections. Why? We determine what connections are present in this sentence - allied coordinating, subordinating, or any other.

According to the meaning, we establish how simple ones are formed in a complex sentence. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. We analyze all simple sentences that make up a complex one in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

All for study » Russian language » Parsing of a sentence

To bookmark a page, press Ctrl+D.

Link: https://site/russkij-yazyk/sintaksicheskij-razbor

1. Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement and emotional coloring.

2. We highlight the grammatical foundations.

3. We select the main and subordinate parts. We determine the type of subordination (sequential, homogeneous, heterogeneous, combined).

5. We explain the punctuation marks in the sentence.

Father interpreted to me, (about what ?) What the entire steppe the bird is hiding along low valleys,(what?) Where grass above And thicker .

1) Narrative, non-exclamatory.

2) First grammatical basis father()interpreted(ch. past tense, indic. n., m.r., singular). Second grammatical basis bird(n., Im. p.) hiding(ch. present time, express. n., f.r., singular). Third grammatical basis grass(n., Im. p.) higher and thicker(cr. adj.).

3) Sentence 3 has grammatical foundations, therefore, it is complex. The first part of the sentence is the main one. 1st and 2nd parts are connected by a subordinating union What. 2nd and 3rd are connected by an allied word Where. The 1st degree clause is indicative, the 2nd degree is attributive. This is a cascading NGN.

, What (), (Where).

5) subordinate clauses separated by commas.

Associative compound sentences

Associative compound sentence- this is such a complex sentence, the parts of which are combined into one whole. Parts of the BSP are connected only by intonation and the ratio of tense forms and the form of verbs. There are no unions and allied words in such sentences.

Punctuation marks in BSP

1. Comma it is set if there are events enumeration relations between the parts of the BSP, actions occur simultaneously or one after the other (comma = unions AND, OR):

2. Semicolon set if:

Between the parts of the sentence, there are relations of enumeration or simultaneity;

Parts of sentences are common and have commas inside.

3. Colon set if:

a) the second part of the sentence indicates the reason for what is said in the first part (colon = conjunctions BECAUSE, BECAUSE):

b) the second part of the sentence reveals the content of the first part (colon = NAMELY, THAT IS):

c) the second part complements the content of the first (colon = AND SAW THAT ...; AND FELT THAT ....):

4. Dash set if:

a) parts of the sentence reflect a quick change of events or an unexpected result:

b) in the first part of the sentence, the time or condition of what is said in the second part is indicated (dash = unions WHEN, THEN ...; IF, THEN ...):

e) the second part of the sentence contains a consequence, a conclusion from the first part (dash = union SO THAT):

BSP parsing

1. Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement, according to emotional coloring.

2. We highlight the grammatical foundations of the sentence.

3. We establish semantic relationships between the parts of the sentence. Explain punctuation marks.

4. We build a graphical scheme of the proposal.

lilies of the valley already ripe- between broad leaves hung solid orange berries.

1) Non-exclamatory, narrative.

2) In the first part of the sentence, the grammatical basis lilies of the valley are ripe. Subject lilies of the valley ripe

In the second part, the grammatical basis hanging berries. Subject berries(n., Im.p.), simple verbal predicate hung(ch. express. n., past tense, pl.).

3) Sentence 2 has grammatical foundations, so it is complex. The second part of the sentence reveals the consequence of what is said in the first: The lilies of the valley were ripe, so hard orange berries hung between the wide leaves.. A dash is placed between the parts of the sentence, so the sentence is non-union.

4) Scheme of the offer: - .

The main members of the proposal

concept

The main members of the proposal - These are the members of the sentence that make up the grammatical basis of the sentence. IN grammatical basis there must be at least one main member, then the proposal is called one-part. The main members of the sentence are the subject and the predicate.

Parsing order

1. Select parts of the sentence (main and subordinate), mark the boundaries.

2. Indicate what explains the subordinate clause (the main sentence as a whole or separately

a new word, which one, indicate the part of speech of this word).

3. Indicate which question the subordinate part answers and what is the means of syntactic

sic connection (union, allied word).

4. Determine the type of subordinate clause.

5. Explain the punctuation marks.

6. Make a diagram.

7. Parse each part as a simple sentence.

A complex sentence with several subordinate clauses is parsed according to the general plan of a complex sentence, but at the same time it is necessary to indicate the type of subordination (homogeneous, parallel, sequential) or a combination of these types.

An example of parsing a complex sentence

1) Who does not recognize, 2) What That , 3) what Lermontov requires from the poet

2) his vocations? (V. Belinsky)

1. The offer consists of three parts:

1) - main;

2) - accessory;

3) - subordinate.

The first clause - a clause of the first degree - explains the main sentence; the second clause - the clause of the second degree - refers to the first clause and explains the subject in it That, expressed by a pronoun. The method of communication is sequential submission.

2. The first-degree clause answers the question of what?, is attached to the main

union proposal What. The subordinate clause of the second degree answers the

ask to a to e ?, attached to the first degree clause with an allied word

what.

3. The first degree clause is explanatory. The subordinate clause of the second degree

nor - pronoun-defining.

4. The first degree clause is separated from the main clause by a comma. By-

since the subordinate clause of the second degree is inside the first clause, it

separated from both sides by commas.

A complex sentence for the purpose of the statement is interrogative, so a question mark is placed at the end of the sentence.

what? which?

, (2 what That, (3 what), 2)?

appendage. I degree appendage. II degree

6. Each part of a complex sentence is parsed as a simple sentence.

TYPES OF ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS
Types of subordinate clauses	Questions	Connection method	Examples
Determinatives refer to the noun, are always after the main or inside the main clause	Which?	Allied words: what, who, which, where, where, from where ...	Yegorushka in hope that the cloud is passing by, peeped out of the robe.
Explanatory refers in the main sentence to words with the meaning of speech (says, ask, answer), thoughts (think, contemplate), feelings (rejoice, sorry, for the sake of others )	Questions of indirect cases	Conjunctions and allied words: what, how, to, whether, etc.	We knew it, that Pet-ka brought only two carp but were silent.
Circumstances replace the position of circumstances of various kinds and answer questions specific to circumstances.
1. Places	Where? Where? Where?	Allied words: where, where, from where	trees around, wherever you look were gold.
2. Time	When? From what time? Until what time?	When, since then, barely, as soon as	Only sometimes, when it came to fronts, the stranger fell silent.
3.Conditions	Under what condition?	If, if...then	If it starts to rain, the tents will have to be moved higher.
4. Reasons	Why? For what reason?	Because, because, since, for	It was probably a bear because the moose does not scream like that and only in autumn.
5. Goals	For what purpose? For what?	to	In order not to get lost I decided to return to the path.
6. Consequences	As a result of which happened?	So	The snow was getting whiter so it hurt my eyes.
7. Mode of action	How? How?	as, as if, exactly, as if	The old man said so like it was very cold.
8. Measures and degrees	To what extent? In what degree? To what extent?	what, how, how much	The rider came back faster than we expected.
9. Comparisons	Like what? Like who? Than what? Than who?	like, like, like, like...	The three of us started a conversation, as if they had known each other for ages.
10. Concessions	Despite What?	although, despite, let, let, for nothing	This house was called the inn, although there was no yard near him.

COMPLEX SUBJECTS WITH SEVERAL SUBJECTS
Type of subordination	Definition	Example
Sequential	The first subordinate clause is subordinate to the main one, and the rest are sequential one after another	Young Cossacks rode vaguely and held back tears, because they were afraid of their father, who was also somewhat embarrassed, though I tried not to show it.
Parallel	Subordinate clauses refer to different words of the same main.	When the cart was already at the end of the village, Chichikov called the first man to him, who, having picked up a thick log somewhere on the road, dragged it on his shoulders.
Homogeneous submission	Subordinate clauses refer to the same word in the main clause and answer the same question.	I saw Yegorushka, how little by little the sky darkened, how the darkness fell to the ground, how stars lit up one by one.
Heterogeneous submission	Subordinate clauses refer to the same word in the main clause, but answer different questions	I had to hire bulls to pull a cart up that damned mountain because it was icy.
Combined submission	Such subordination, in which some subordinate clauses consistently obey each other, others - in parallel, homogeneously or heterogeneously.	In the air, wherever you look, swirling whole clouds of snowflakes, so you don't understand , whether it is snowing from the sky or from the ground.

SYNTAX PARSE OF A COMPLEXLY SUBJECTED SENTENCE
Parsing order	Sample parsing
1. Select parts of the sentence (main and subordinate), mark the boundaries. 2. Indicate what explains the subordinate clause (the main sentence as a whole or single word, which one, indicate the part of speech of this word). 3. Indicate what question the subordinate clause answers and what is the means of syntactic connection (conjunction, allied word). 4. Determine the type of subordinate clause. 5. Explain the punctuation marks. 6. Make a diagram. 7. Parse each part as a simple sentence. A complex sentence with several subordinate clauses is parsed according to the general plan of the complex sentence, but at the same time it is necessary to indicate the type of subordination (homogeneous, parallel, sequential) or a combination of these types.	1) Who do not recognize, 2) What That , 3) what Lermontov requires from the poet 2) is one of the duties his vocations? (V. Belinsky) 1. The proposal consists of three parts: 1) - main; 2) - accessory; 3) - subordinate. The first clause - the first degree clause - explains the main sentence; the second clause - the clause of the second degree - refers to the first clause and explains the subject in it That, expressed by a pronoun. The method of communication is sequential subordination. 2. The first-degree clause answers the question of what?, is attached to the main sentence with the union What. The subordinate clause of the second degree answers the question to a - to about e ?, is attached to the subordinate clause of the first degree with an allied word what.
Parsing order	Sample parsing
	3. The first degree clause is explanatory. The subordinate clause of the second degree is a pronoun-determinant. 4. The first degree clause is separated from the main clause by a comma. Since the second-degree clause is inside the first clause, it is separated from both sides by commas. A complex sentence for the purpose of the statement is interrogative, so a question mark is placed at the end of the sentence. what? which? 5. , (2 what That, (3 what), 2)? appendage. I degree appendage. II degree 6. Each part of a complex sentence is parsed as a simple sentence.

KINDS COMPLEX SENTENCES
№ p/n	View appendage foot	Question	Means connections	Meaning adnexal	Example
	Definitive	WHICH? WHICH? WHICH? WHICH?	Allied words: which, which, whose, who, what, where, where, from where, when	Is a definition in relation to a noun or a place-ownership in the main part	“You don’t need to tire your neighbors with incessant jokes, witticisms and anecdotes that have already been told by someone to your listeners”(According to D.S. Likhachev). “An educated person is one who wants and knows how to reckon with others ...”(D.S. Likhachev)
	Explanatory	QUESTIONS OF INDIRECT CASES	Unions: what, how, whether, bud, so that, no matter how Allied words: what, how, who, where, what, from where, why, how much	Refers to the verb in the main clause and expresses an additional explanation	“I am convinced that our true upbringing is manifested primarily at home, in relations with our relatives.”(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	Mode of action, degree	HOW? HOW? IN WHAT DEGREE?	Unions: to, like, as if, exactly, as if, as if... Allied words: how, how much	Refers to the verb, adverb, adjective, noun in the main and expresses the meaning of the mode of action, degree	“Behave in such a way that modesty and the ability to remain silent move to the first place”(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	Places	WHERE? WHERE? WHERE?	Allied words: where, where, from where	Place specification	“Intelligence is present where there is respect for others, the world, nature”(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	time	WHEN? HOW LONG? SINCE WHEN?	Unions: when, until, barely, only, since, as long as, while, before, as long as	Clarification of the time of action	As the culture of humanity moves forward, new values ​​are added to the old ones, increasing their value for today.(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	Conditions	UNDER WHAT CONDITION?	Unions: if, if, if, if, if, once, when, if only,	An indication of the condition under which the action occurs, called the predicate verb	“If he is polite with acquaintances, and gets irritated with his family on every occasion,–he is an ill-mannered person"
№ p/n	View appendage foot	Question	Means connections	Meaning adnexal	Example
			as soon as		(D.S. Likhachev)
	Causes	WHY? FROM WHAT?	Unions: because, because, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, for, since	Explanation of the reason	“... I appeal mainly to the man, to the head of the family, because a woman really needs to give way ... not only at the door”(According to D.S. Likhachev).
	Goals	FOR WHAT? FOR WHAT? FOR WHAT PURPOSE?	Unions: so that, in order to, in order to, just to, just to	Appointment of an action called a verb-goal-predicate	“... no need to loudly put the fork on the plate, noisily draw soup into oneself, speak loudly at dinner or speak with a full mouth so that the neighbors do not have fears”(D.S. Likhachev).
	Comparative	HOW?	Unions: as, as if, exactly, as if, as if, like, like, as, what, than, than	Comparison of two actions, states	“To be able to apologize, to admit a mistake to others is better than to play up, lie, thereby beckoning, first of all, himself"(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	concessive	DESPITE WHAT? AGAINST WHAT?	Unions: although, at least, let, let, yes-rum that, despite the fact that. Allied words: what is NO, who is NO, how NO, where NO, when NO.	An indication of what the action is being done in spite of	“Despite the fact that we are overcome by petty worries and the bustle of everyday life, we must be able to be open and tolerant of people.”(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	Consequences		Union: So	Consequence, conclusion, conclusion	“It is in youth that the mind of a person is most receptive to the assimilation of knowledge, so do not waste time on trifles, on “rest”(According to D.S. Likhachev)
	Connecting		Allied words: What(in nominative and indirect cases: why, why, why), why, why, why	Additional Information, remarks, to everything important	“A person brings good to people, alleviating their suffering in case of illness, which gives him the opportunity to receive real joy”(According to D.S. Likhachev). We were already tiptoeing in the corridor, which surprised my sister very much.