Once I came across one quote, and in it I found everything that I felt about the school - and I realized that I needed to talk about it. So that others who live the way it is customary can think about it. Stay. Get inspired.

“And they created the school just as the devil had commanded them. The child loves nature, so he was locked in four walls. The child likes to know that his work has some meaning, so everything was arranged so that his activity did not bring any benefit. He cannot remain motionless - he has been forced to be immobile. He loves to work with his hands, and he was taught theories and ideas. He likes to talk - he was ordered to be silent. He seeks to understand - he was told to learn by heart. He would like to seek knowledge himself - they are given to him ready-made ...

And then the children learned what they would never have learned in other conditions. They have learned to lie and pretend. And that's what happened. As the devil wanted it, some people withered, became lethargic and passive, lost all interest in life. They lost happiness and health. Lost love and kindness. Thoughts became dry and gray, souls hardened, hearts embittered.

Adolf Ferrier (early 20th century, Switzerland)

I ask myself one question all the time. God gave me a child. For me to educate him secularly and teach him how to make money? So that I can hand it over as a storage room somewhere and continue to do my super-important business? To make me proud of his A's in chemistry? So that he would bring me a glass of water in my old age? Or to wash the dishes and clean the room for them?

Or was the child given to me so that first I myself would find answers to my inner questions, and then tell him? So that I can help him grow in himself best qualities character? It is generally stated in the Srimad-Bhagavatam that unless a person is sure that he can deliver the soul of a child who comes to him from the cycle of birth and death, he should not become a parent. In the past, this was a very serious question.

Therefore, every moment of our life with children is valuable for me. Where they spend the most time affects them the most. The people with whom they connect more and more deeply determine their values ​​and path. And I don't want to risk putting kids in a random number generator called school. This is not a casino to watch whether you won or lost, whether it worked out or not, whether the risk is justified. The stakes are too high to be thrown around like that. For me, the souls of children are more important than the system and correctness.

Once I thought that only we had better schools somewhere. I was wrong. The principle is the same everywhere. And in almost every country, the school system is outdated, there is not much useful in them, but somewhere the child’s psyche is at least less harmed. But still there are single schools that inspire. Schools that might be helpful. Schools to which I could send my children, if such were nearby.

What schools would be helpful?

• Schools with real teachers.

Such as Shalva Amonashvili. Loving children with all their hearts, loving their work. Happy and harmonious personalities who have a lot to learn. But are there many such teachers?

• Schools with separate education for boys and girls.

It's always been that way before. And only now, because it is more profitable, the flows have been combined. Although they need to be taught in different ways and in different ways. And if there is a person of the opposite sex in the class, it is more difficult to study. It is to study. Yes, and maintain chastity, and clarity of mind - too.

• home schools.

Where several children are taught together, with love and understanding of their features and differences. Such schools are now emerging. There is a lot of love in them, but unfortunately, there are too many features.

• spiritual schools.
  As it was several hundred years ago - schools at monasteries, temples, gurukulas. This knowledge and experience is not enough now. And we all need it every day. There are Sunday schools, and this is already a good addition to regular education. But this is not enough - too rare and small compared to the rest. To be honest, I would gladly take the boys to a good gurukula - at least for a year, two or three.
• Mastery Schools.
  Musical, artistic, dance. Not in their current form, of course. Where children would gather not by age and region, but by interests. Where they would be happy to do something together, share, exchange.
• Schools for future and mothers.
  This is what is sorely lacking. But such a school cannot be mass, to a greater extent such a school should exist in every house where there is a little girl. But alas, mother has no time to deal with nonsense, and her daughter must receive a “normal” education.
• Schools of real men.
  A place where the boys would get what they need physical training, the knowledge necessary for life, and could develop the necessary qualities. Where are these schools? There are practically none.

But there is another alternative to schools. Homeschooling, family schooling or unschooling - life without school - is a new, rather fashionable trend. It can be organized in different ways. It has pros and cons. Let's tell you how I see it.

How can you organize home schooling?

• Teachers coming from school every day

There is a possibility; I know that many people use it. This happens for free if the child has health problems. But I am sure that it is possible to negotiate personally with those teachers that you like.

• Tutors for various subjects

You can invite a teacher for each subject - it will turn out to be a tidy sum. Yes, and I don't see the need for it. It seems to me that tutors are needed precisely for the most favorite subjects that the child is most interested in.

• Monthly preparation for exams

Many parents said that, on average, a child can master the annual school program in a month or two of intensive classes. And at the end of the year he passes the necessary exams. When the rest of the time he does what he wants, and then he studies with a teacher, for example. It will be cheaper than inviting a teacher every day, it will not be so extended in time, and there will be an opportunity to develop in other places.

• Pass exams at once for many years

Few people know, but in our country you can come to school and take an exam for any class. That is, if you have never been attached anywhere, but come and pass all the necessary exams at once, then you will be given a certificate. That is, you can not take the same thing every year with a different sauce, but do it only once. Although this requires more awareness from parents.

• self-teach

I know mothers who take textbooks themselves and go through them step by step with their children. Not suitable for everyone, because even doing homework with children is a test. And to learn from and to - it's how much patience you need!

• Internet sites for schoolchildren

I have already heard several times that there are schools that already organize online learning. There, the child has assignments, plans, and exams. In foreign schools there are already so many places, and in Russia it is also found. And besides, there are many sites for schoolchildren, where they can solve examples, do assignments, get practice and theory of the necessary subjects. Here, of course, you need to be very careful - there are so many things on the Internet that are not very useful for children.

• Interest groups

This is the answer, rather, to the question of where to get communication and how to stay at home all the time. I am for children to communicate - where there are children with the same hobbies. For example, art, music, choreographic schools, and so on, provided that the child himself is ready to go there and he likes it. There are also sports sections, creative workshops and other less “strict” institutions where everything is not so serious and complicated.

That is, you need to choose any options based on your capabilities and the needs of the child. What exactly he wants, what suits you, what talents he has.

What are the benefits of unschooling?

• Flexibility.

The program is tailored to the child, his interests and abilities.

The child can choose when, what and how deeply to engage. He becomes the main one. That is education for the child, not the child for education.

Flexibility and graphics, and programs.

• Opportunity to choose communication.

Maybe it is much more interesting for a child to be friends with those who are older? Or vice versa with the younger ones? Or with musicians, artists? There is such an opportunity when you choose your communication.

• Minimum stress for the child and parents

I heard an interesting observation from a mother of many children, whose children study at home. That there is no stress in the house since the children stopped going to school. There is no more morning rush, and instead of it - a long family breakfast, there is no need to wake up the children strenuously, to drive them out of the house. And the kids are learning! Also yourself! Sit, read, solve problems.

• No need to put children in some mold that it is not clear who came up with

Our fears of “what people will think” are very much aggravated at school, there they can think about us more than anyone, and, of course, they will. That's what the system was made for. Many different conditions are imposed on the child in the system, many of which only seem reasonable and correct.

• Lots of free time

The child has a lot of free time. And you can decide for yourself what to do with it, what he can do. Developing abilities, talents, or just having time to be a kid and just play. Many parents are now convinced that free time- this is bad. But it is much worse when it is completely absent from childhood.

• No unnecessary comparisons and competitions

At school, there is no way without it. Worst and best, fives and threes, who is faster - and so on. Children are compared according to grades, abilities, some are cited as an example, others as an anti-example. At home, you can do without all this. And easy enough.

• You can teach what you want and not be afraid that someone will spoil it

Many mothers say that what is the point of teaching a child morality if they explain to him at school that this is the last century? Likewise, any spiritual knowledge in schools will be discounted.

But if you teach a child at home, then it is you who decide what is basic and what is additional. And you can pay more attention to what, in your opinion, the child will need more in life.

For example, for cooking.

• Curiosity persists.

The child receives all knowledge exactly when he is ready for it. He's really interested to know how and why it all works. He himself is looking for answers to his questions, asks his parents, acquaintances.

I heard an interesting way from some parents. They have many children, so very important things are explained only to one person and in secret. And everyone else is told that this is secret information, and only this person owns it. And that's it. They themselves find knowledge, extract it, master it - and use it.

• Spend more time and attention on what you like

There is one interesting video on the Internet, a teenager talks about how he studies without school. His passion is skiing. And he learns everything else through skiing, can we think of such a thing? No. How is this related? And what about skiing? And for him, they are the key that triggers his interest and inspiration, which are then sent to the study of other subjects. At school, there is no time to waste time looking for a key to everyone. Yes, and not rationally - how then to teach them all? But at home, you can.

• The ability to feed your baby the way you want.

Who cares, but in a regular school it’s not easy for a vegetarian. I know, I've often been in ordinary canteens where everyone tries to stick a cutlet in you. I had to eat buns. Everything else was meat. Now I can feed my kids homemade, wholesome, vegetarian meals throughout the day. And at the same time, no good aunts can persuade them to eat sausage. Nice unschooling bonus.

• Time for sports and creativity

When there is free time, it can be directed to important things. For example, sports for boys. On creativity and home arts for girls. All this can become a normal background of life, and not an exclusive once a week activity. Interesting thing. It seemed to me before that our children do not do any sports. After all, we don’t take them anywhere on purpose, and then I was surprised. Every day they spend an average of 4-5 hours in the pool. Sometimes more, sometimes less. They dive, practice holding their breath, try different styles of swimming. Every day for several years now. At the same time, if a child is taken twice a week to the pool in the city for an hour-long lesson (plus another hour or two for the road back and forth), it is considered that he is engaged in swimming. This is how our own brain deceives us.

• Real Deep Relationships

When a child learns at home, with parents, together with parents, your bonds become stronger and stronger.

You just see each other more often, communicate more often, you have more joint adventures and experiences. And this has a very positive effect on your relationship. The child is attached to you, not to the society of immature peers. And that's great.

• The child learns to live in a family.

Ordinary school child he does not know how to live in a family, it becomes uncomfortable and incomprehensible to him there. And there is no deep contact, and I’m used to being entertained, distracted, occupied. And in the family, other laws apply. And homeschooling also teaches how to live in a family. It just teaches in passing. But such an important and useful skill.

• Less disease

This is very important for children with weak immunity. The health of children at school is always falling. Viruses, bacteria, epidemics flourish there in the format of one school. Children exchange all this, get sick, infect each other. When a child studies at home, he is much less likely to get sick. The experience of many families confirms this. And besides, you don’t have to “draw” fake vaccinations here if you don’t put them.

• You choose how to present the material and where to put accents.

For example, why does a child need biology if it says nothing about healthy eating, daily routine, how to take care of your health? Why does a child need to study physics divorced from life, when you can learn it by examples, setting up simple experiments? You decide which books your child needs to read now, which later, and you can explain to him what classic literature- this is not a guide to action and not a standard. These are just stories from which different conclusions can be drawn. And yes, you can help your child form the right principles.

• The ability to travel

Unschooling opens up opportunities not only during the holidays and longer than 2 weeks. Opportunity to live in different countries, to spend the winter in summer, to study many things not from books, but live, to master languages, to study other cultures.

We can say that the child will grow up like an ignoramus. But for some reason it seems to me that those who are so raped by education that they do not take books in their hands and do not study anything themselves are more like ignoramuses.

I know examples of children who began to read "late" - at the age of 9 or 10. And for several years then they consciously re-read not only the school, but also the in-depth program. With a full understanding of what they read - and with great interest. I will never forget one such girl. She so sincerely admired the style of Dostoevsky and his descriptions, such genuine interest and depth! And she was only 13 years old. I read Dostoevsky at the age of 15-16, and he aroused admiration far from immediately, but at the age of 20. And which of us is an ignoramus?

But in general, yes, I foresee "delights". It’s good for this Valyaeva to speak! She herself has a diploma and a certificate, but she raises her children uneducated and unpromising!

Yes, I do have regular education. And even higher. But what did it give me more - benefit or harm? Would I be "stupid" if I didn't go to school? Would you be healthier?

I learned to read at the age of 6, before school. I read all my favorite books outside the school curriculum and even in spite of it: after all, it was necessary to read Chernyshevsky there, and I was fond of Lermontov. Lermontov, at whose school they passed briefly, in contrast to the same Pushkin. And they forced me to teach Pushkin, although at that time I continued to teach Lermontov.

I never used physics, chemistry, history, or biology anywhere, which I had to cram instead of drawing, writing stories and walking. With geography, everything was very bad for me, and on my travels I discovered the world from scratch, or even from a minus - contrary to school knowledge. It was the same with astronomy - the world turned out to be much more interesting than it was in this boring textbook. It was the same with difficulty - the school gave me such an aversion to women's affairs and needlework that it still haunts me. But initially I was interested in cooking, and sewing, and embroidering.

Yes, at school I was lucky with the first English teacher, and thanks to her I fell in love with the language. But what would happen if I continued to study the language with a good teacher, in my own mode and in the way that interests me, and did not gouge the same topics like London is a capital of the Great Britain? How much better would my language be now? Especially conversational?

As, by the way, and my self-esteem, which had such a hard time at school. I didn’t really fit anywhere with my introversion. And then I found the image of “my boyfriend”, I did what I didn’t like myself in order to get the communication of people with whom I had never communicated since then ... That is, I betrayed myself many times over the years for no reason at all .

The school gave me the feeling that the world is a hell in which you have to survive, that men are stupid and women are treacherous. That no one cares. Nobody needs your talents. That being yourself is a waste of time. What it takes to make money. And the rest doesn't matter. That friendship does not exist. That love is also a fairy tale. The school taught me to lie, command, swear, arrogance and the desire for grades instead of knowledge.

Now we have 90 percent of people with education, more than half of them also have higher education. And what? At the same time, there are very few people who are happy, there are also very few harmonious families, only a few and those who have found and realized themselves. But every year more and more people are looking for their own, and the meaning of life. And someone finds himself, and someone drowns out the pain of his own loss with alcohol, computer games and shopping. Do we need such education? Or is it time for a change?

And by the way, getting a certificate if necessary at any age is not difficult. But to get a base that can be laid in family education, somehow later it will not work. Alas.

But lest you think that unschooling is easy, I want to dispel your myths. It won't suit everyone. Far from everyone. It has some pretty significant downsides.

• Responsibility is yours alone.

This is the most important and terrible minus. Strictly speaking, she is always on you, these are your children. But at school there is always the opportunity to blame the school itself for something bad. They taught a child bad things there, they spoiled it. It won't work at home. Everything that the child has - you yourself have invested.

• Learn to live differently and manage time differently.

In the usual picture, you rent a child somewhere for the whole day and you can enjoy and do your own thing. And how to manage to live with a child without handing it over anywhere? How to learn to trust him, leaving him alone at home, for example? Or how to do things with him (which can be extremely useful for him in general)? Parents who teach their children themselves will have to change. And strong enough.

• Learn by yourself.

If a child is studying at home, his parent should be one step ahead. That is, we ourselves cannot stop in our development, because it is necessary to set an example, to inspire. We must answer their questions, study, dive. There is no one to whom it can be pushed. We will have to finally become educated ourselves, and not try to appear as such.

• Change your priorities.

When you teach children yourself, you need to give up perfectionism, the race for grades, the arguments “it's just necessary and that's it.” You'll have to get rid of your own school luggage - and it won't be easy. You will need to reconsider both your role in the child's life and the child's role in your life. It is not so easy.

• Adoption.

You will need tremendous acceptance. Because it is easy to force, it is easy to drive everyone into one form. And to see that each child needs his own, and to accept this is difficult. Waiting for a child to become interested in reading is more difficult than getting him to read and write. Accepting his unwillingness to learn English now is difficult. Especially when all the children have been learning it for a long time. It is very difficult. But what a powerful training!

• You will be stalked.

Everyone who is different from the majority receives increased attention. And far from positive. Get ready for hundreds of questions that no one wants to hear answers to, for gloomy forecasts, for being called irresponsible cultists (strange, right? Consciously choosing the education of a child is irresponsible, but putting him in a maximum security cell is taking care of him future). You will be told that you are ruining the life of a child, and so on and so forth.

The cons are quite serious. That's why I say that this system is not for everyone. It would be easier for many to find a home school, to reconsider their personal approach to all this, for example, not to give an after-school program and not torturing them with lessons. But I am sure that unschooling is the future. Because he is able to reveal the potential of the child and strengthen his relationship with his parents.

Entering unschooling out of desperation and not understanding how else to educate a child in such a way as not to cripple his personality, you will come out of him completely different people. This experience will change you and your children and your relationship with them. This is a real transformation, which is quite painful in the process.

This is our choice, and everyone makes it independently. Even by the fact that it does not make it, it still chooses something. And it's good that now there are opportunities for this. On the Internet you can find a lot of experience of parents whose children do not go to school. Read the legal aspects, and psychological, and how to teach, and what to teach. But this is all secondary. There would be a desire - there will be tools. The only question is what we choose for our children today.

To be continued…

Website

Olga Valyaeva

Another bell rang, heralding the start of a new school year. Someone went to first grade this year, and for someone the first bell will ring next year, but for now he is just getting ready to become a schoolboy. But there are guys among the future first-graders who will not go to school on the first of September. These children are quite healthy and have already reached the “conscription” age. They just study at home. To put it in the exact language of the law, they receive a family education. We, perhaps, will not now go into discussions about the pros and cons of such training. Enough has already been said on this subject. As a person who himself studied in this way, and as a mother preparing her daughter for this type of education, I will be honest - I personally do not see any disadvantages in family education. The only “minus” is that you need to be with the child all the time, at least in elementary school. Maybe there are kids who can independently gnaw the granite of science at such a tender age, but something tells me that they are negligible. That is, with this type of training, either the mother does not work (or works at home), or the parents somehow alternate with each other. And this is acceptable and may not be for every family. There is another point that makes homeschooling problematic, if not impossible - not every child is able to perceive his mother as a teacher. It happens. At the same time, the child can be as flexible and obedient as you like, the mother can be a very authoritative person for him, and they can have a very kind and trusting relationship. It’s just that for such a child, a mother is a MOM, big, kind and soft, she smells of milk and cookies and is in no way associated with a school teacher. In this case, home schooling may not be necessary. I don't see any more contraindications. Therefore, let's agree that we will talk about preparing the child (or rather the whole family) for home schooling, implying that the decision has already been weighed and made.

This way of learning is now becoming more and more popular. This step is decided by parents with different education and different worldviews. Everyone has different reasons for such a decision - someone is categorically not satisfied with the school system, someone is afraid of the aggressiveness of their peers, someone saves their child's nerves and time for classes future profession or just doing things you love - the school “eats up” too much time, and for some it’s just more convenient because of frequent moves. Quite a bit, literally a couple of paragraphs, I will devote to the theory of the issue.

There are two concepts: "unschooling" - this is when a child receives an education without a school at all, and "homeschooling" - when a child takes exams in educational institution i.e. attached to it. In Russia now unsookling is possible only theoretically. Yes, according to the law, you can come in 11 years to the final exams, and study at home all the time, but at the same time, another law obliges all children who have reached the age of eight to study somewhere and somehow. Proving that your child is homeschooled and not deprived of their right to education by negligent parents can be tricky. Therefore, human rights activists in this area recommend that you still be “at school”, keep in touch with her periodically in order to avoid possible problems with guardianship authorities.

Any general education school can deal with such children, but in practice, not every one goes for it. The law allows this - no one can oblige the school to conclude an agreement on family education. But a "home" child, if desired, can study in any city, regardless of his residence permit. IN big cities it is simpler - there are more such schools, while in small ones there is often a single school in which children who are in family education take exams.

Not everyone knows that parents who teach children at home are entitled to monthly monetary compensation. But often schools refuse it. It is illegal. If you wish, you can achieve this compensation through calls to the department of education - the law is on the side of the parents. But to do it or not is up to you. That's probably the whole theory.

My daughter will become a first grader in a year, so it's time for us, like all other future first graders, to start preparatory academic year. And then I thought about it and realized that there is absolutely no need to prepare a child for such training in any special way. (Here, by the way, is another plus of home education!). It is enough for a child to be developed by age and to have at least a minimum of knowledge and skills. What will change for my child with the advent of the school? Nothing. It will develop and learn in the same way as it did before - at its own rhythm, in its own "style", at its own speed. Obviously, classes "at the table" from more or less regular will turn into just regular. That's all, perhaps. I need some clarification here: by “desk” today, I mean practicing handwriting and learning to write and read. mathematical operations. That is, things that you want or don’t want need to be worked out and trained. We try to get all other knowledge not at the table, but from life, without allocating special time for them. “Table” creativity (drawing, burning, embroidery, modeling) and reading are also not on our list of activities, because they naturally arise by themselves all the time. It's just that we meet all the questions, lessons and tasks that life puts before us joyfully and openly, we always try to learn a little more than the situation offers. Example: in the spring we changed the roof of our house, and suddenly we saw a bird's nest with chicks on the pediment of the house. Of course, the construction had to be postponed for a while. But what does short term mean? To find out, we called our ornithological center, talked to specialists, leafed through the Birds of Russia photo catalog more than once, read a large number of articles on the Internet, watched more than one program and, of course, watched the nest every day. We found out who built a house under our roof, how long the chicks will live in the nest, and along the way discovered a lot of interesting and varied information from the life of other birds in our region. All this was with the active participation of my daughter, and I am sure that she remembered a lot of the knowledge gained, because this knowledge came to us on time, in a natural way, and was not invented and programmed in advance: “and today we start the theme week“ birds ".

And I can give a great many such examples, they are daily. Life itself is a wonderful and varied curriculum, and, interestingly, it always turns out to be “according to growth” for the student. I really want my daughter and I to study this way for as long as possible, solving real problems, and at the table with textbooks and notebooks, only summarizing what we learned, saw, felt, discovered in practice.

The only innovation that awaits us is exams. School-going peers will encounter them noticeably later. This is what the child needs to be prepared for. To communicate with the teacher-examiner. What does it mean? This means fully and accurately formulating each of your answers and every thought, this mother will understand perfectly, and the teacher is not obliged to do this. The second is not to be afraid of incomprehensible questions, often the questions are familiar, they are simply asked in an unusual form for the child. Do not hesitate to clarify, ask again, start reasoning on the basis of what is clear and understandable.

What am I doing now for this?

That, perhaps, is all our preparation for school. But who needs to really prepare for the first grade is mom. There are a lot of questions that she must answer before her son or daughter becomes a "home" student.

1. Study mode - will it be close to school or more spontaneous? It depends on the nature of the child, on the lifestyle of the family, on habits and routines.
2. Mom should think over and build the work in such a way as to avoid "hands-on work" - you need to have time for the tests calmly and without nerves.
3. You can study according to one of the school programs, or you can do without them. This needs to be decided in advance. If necessary, study and choose the most appropriate program for a particular child.
4. Will all subjects be studied in parallel, or will we “dive” into each subject separately? It is also possible to combine these methods. It's also a good idea to ask yourself this question ahead of time and maybe try out the options in your pre-school year.
5. Well, and a rhetorical question: how to make sure that studying at home does not turn into a branch of the school with many hours of daily sitting “on the priest” at the table. Something can be done verbally, something while walking, something on a walk, something lying on the couch, and so on - mom should have a lot of ideas and options that can be quickly changed if necessary.

An impressive list of questions. So let's send the mother to the preparatory class, and let the child continue his education as usual. The mother should prepare in such a way that all the innovations associated with the emergence of the controlling eye of the school in the life of the family would be smooth and imperceptible for the child, and therefore painless.

And finally, one more question, perhaps the most important in home schooling - where will the child go with the freed time? There is much more time to live with this method of learning. So where will the child spend it? Does he have favorite things to do? Does he live rich life or will he wander up to the house from the TV to the computer? In this case, homeschooling loses all meaning.

That's all. Thank you for attention. And to all the future first-graders and their parents who have chosen this not the easiest, but very interesting and full of various possibilities way of creating their image - EDUCATION - I wish you every success!

P.S. This article is author's and entirely intended solely for private use, publication and use of it on other sites or forums is possible only with the written consent of the author. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.

The new coronavirus - a "relative" of the old SARS - has already led to the death of 26 people. It is believed that several thousand may be infected with it. And it is known for certain that the epidemic has spread beyond China. But this is no reason to panic. We collected all the known information and tried to answer the main questions about the new disease.

1. Everywhere they write about this virus. Is everything really that serious? Was this not the case before?

Definitely, the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV is serious. As of the morning of January 24, 893 cases and 26 deaths are known, that is, the mortality rate for the disease is 2.9%, and this percentage may increase (some of the cases are in critical condition). Given the incubation period, there may be several thousand infected in total, and the number of victims can reach hundreds.

Map of the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus by region in China. Black shows distribution regions on January 11, 2020, lighter shades - on January 20, 21, 22 and 23 (the later, the lighter). Geographically, the spread looks very fast / ©Wikimedia Commons

Something similar has happened before: SARS in 2002-2003 infected eight thousand people and killed 775 of them. It also spread from China and also originated initially due to contact with animals (bats), which were the reservoir for the basic form of the SARS virus. The then virus-causative agent was also a coronavirus and is genetically 70 percent identical to the new one. That is, that SARS and the new epidemic are relatively close “relatives”.

Map of the spread of the epidemic around the planet. However, in last days such maps get outdated all the time, so it's not a fact that this one will remain relevant for a long time / © Wikimedia Commons

At that time, the spread of the disease was contained by quarantine measures. The new coronavirus is reliably transmitted from person to person. If not contained by quarantine measures, 2019-nCoV could theoretically kill many more people.

2. Is the new coronavirus dangerous for the young as well, or only for those who are older?

Be clear: 2019-nCoV is just another virus that can cause pneumonia. Therefore, the chances of dying from it are higher for those who have them higher and with ordinary pneumonia. That is, first of all in those who later went to the doctor with symptoms, and - secondly - in those who are older or suffer from chronic diseases, including the respiratory system.

Scheme with overall structure 2019-nCoV coronavirus / ©Roger Harris/Science Photo Library/Getty Image

Take SARS, the related coronavirus epidemic 18 years ago. According to the WHO, the chances of dying from it were on average 9%, but for those under 24, it was less than one percent. At the age of 25-44 years - up to six percent, 44-64 years old - up to 15 percent, from 65 years and older - above 55 percent. This does not mean that young people have nothing to fear, but it certainly means that those who are older should think about it.

With a high probability, this will be the case with new pneumonia, whose causative agent is a “relative” of atypical pneumonia.

3. Is it possible, in principle, that some new virus will arise that will kill many people, and we will not have anything to protect ourselves with?

This story happens systematically. Take the measles virus: geneticists determined that around the 11th-12th centuries it was a common bovine virus. Then he mutated so that he could spread between people: and began to kill by the millions. Back in 1980, it killed 2.6 million, and it still infects 20 million a year. According to WHO, even in 2017, he (though not without the help of anti-vaccinators) killed 110,000 people. As we can see, SARS is just a trifle against this background. She was so seriously covered in the media only because they love everything new and unusual.

Moreover, even the “relatives” of 2019-nCoV constantly infect us: coronaviruses, among other things, cause a runny nose, they often hide behind the abbreviation SARS, and so on. Normally, the virus stably exists only if it does not threaten the carriers with frequent death. Because each such death means that the number of carriers decreases, and with a large-scale epidemic, there will be so few of them that sooner or later the epidemic will end. This means that there will be fewer active viruses.

In the era of the First World War, there were no vaccines or antivirals, so the fight against viruses was reduced to masks, without which even a tram was sometimes not allowed / © Wikimedia Commons

However, sometimes "abnormal" lines appear in the realm of viruses. For example, one of the most rapidly mutating viruses, influenza, in 1918-1919 infected a third of the world's population and killed at least 50 million people (the Spanish flu epidemic). This is several times more than died in the First World War and about the same as died in the Second.

Fortunately, today we have medicine that is rapidly creating vaccines. Weakened forms of the virus are grown for short time, vaccination will drastically reduce mortality from any analogue of the "Spanish flu".

There is one scenario where a virus could theoretically kill many people at once, despite vaccines. Take HIV: it infects part of the cells of the immune system, so the immune system does not cope well with it. It is so difficult to create a vaccine against it that only now its first tests are underway - although the virus itself has been known for decades.

If an airborne virus emerges, like the new coronavirus in China, but at the same time affects immune cells, like HIV, then it will not be possible to quickly create a vaccine against it. In this case, a large number of victims and long time there is no protection against such a virus.

The probability of such a development of events is small: the virus specializes in the defeat of one type of cell. The same HIV, in order to attack the cells of the immune system, is looking for among them those that have CD4 receptors. But among the cells in the respiratory tract, there are not very many of them: in non-immune cells, such receptors are rare. So normally, the virus can be either intractable, like HIV, or easily transmitted, like measles.

Perhaps these traits can really be combined artificially - and get a virus that affects both immune cells and ordinary cells of the body, including those in the respiratory tract, in order to make it highly contagious. For example, it might make sense when creating biological weapons. But so far, the technologies available to geneticists are extremely far from the level required for such a combination.

4. How can you reduce the chance of getting a new virus?

Like most coronaviruses - that is, like with a common cold. First, try to exclude contacts with likely carriers. The new coronavirus comes from bat and Chinese venomous snake coronavirus genes. Presumably a Chinese cobra, although the snake hypothesis raises questions. Both those and others are traded in Chinese markets with exotic living creatures that are eaten there.

The epicenter of the new epidemic is Wuhan, and there it went from the local seafood market, where they sell all these cobras and the like. Due to the recombination of the genetic materials of two lines of coronaviruses, 2019-nCoV arose in this market. Therefore, we categorically do not advise you to visit Wuhan and, to be honest, China in general - at least until the epidemic is dealt with there. It is worth recalling that it has already reached Thailand (several cases of the disease), South Korea, Japan, the USA, Singapore, Vietnam and Saudi Arabia, so it is also better to postpone trips there until the situation is clearer.

The same market in China where the virus spread from. By law, this is a seafood market, but in fact they traded marmots, poisonous snakes, bats and other exotic animals sold for meat. Now the market is closed, disinfection was carried out there, but this did not stop the disease / ©Getty Image

If you are already in China, avoid seafood markets and exotic animals, drink only bottled water and do not consume foods that have not been processed at high temperatures: analogues of sushi and ceviche, as well as uncooked meat.

And always wash your hands after visiting public places and contacting new people. All viruses transmitted by airborne droplets actively settle on the hands, because people touch their mouth and nose with them an average of 300 times a day. In experiments, one person with a viral infection, touching the handle on the door in a large office, leads to the fact that the virus is on all the handles in the office (healthy employees carry it further with their own hands). Therefore, it is worth paying attention to hand hygiene Special attention. If you can't wash your hands every time, use alcohol wipes.

5. Should I buy masks in advance? And what?

Oddly enough, such coronaviruses do not spread “with one sneeze”. The fact is that all viruses are specialized for the base carrier. Part of the 2019-nCoV genes came from a bat (body temperature varies widely, much more than that of humans), part from a snake, cold-blooded (the temperature is much lower than human). This means that the new coronavirus is not ideally suited for human-to-human transmission.

Doctors wearing masks and goggles transport a patient at a Wuhan hospital on January 17, 2019 / © Getty Images

Nevertheless, masks reduce the likelihood of infection with it - and noticeably. However, there is no point in buying them in advance (so far there is not a single confirmed case of the disease in Russia), as well as bothering with the choice of some particular type of such a mask. Almost all of them today are close in terms of capabilities. If it still comes to an epidemic in our country, it is worth remembering that the mask must be changed at least once every few hours.

6. How long does it take for the virus to show up? How to understand that you are sick?

The incubation period of the virus is about five days. That is, if you have returned from China or other countries where the epidemic already exists, then only after about a week of the absence of symptoms can you begin to relax.

An elevated temperature indicates infection with 2019-nCoV: an increase can be both moderate and severe, but is present in 90% of cases. In 80% of cases, there is a dry cough and rapidly onset fatigue. Shortness of breath and shortness of breath are much less common. Pulse, respiration and pressure in the early stages are normal - there is no point in checking them.

It is worth consulting a doctor if these symptoms are found in anyone who has been to countries where the epidemic has penetrated. The specialist will be able to make a diagnosis based on a picture of your lungs: there the new coronavirus leaves traces typical of pneumonia.

7. And if you still got infected? What to do?

First of all, do not panic and do not get depressed. These are not just soothing words: 17 years ago, studies showed that with negative emotions (or memories of sad situations), a person’s level of antibodies in the blood drops dramatically. Roughly speaking, nature does not need losers and those who are depressed. Therefore, to lose heart during an illness is the surest way to reduce the body's ability to resist it.

Meanwhile, your own immunity is especially important if you catch 2019-nCoV. There is no specific treatment for it yet, although it is expected that a number of antiviral drugs for other coronaviruses may help.

Therefore, when infected, you should calmly follow all the recommendations of the attending physicians (and not “treat” yourself at home) and not be nervous once again.

8. Is it safe to receive parcels from Aliexpress now? Or is it better to leave it at the post office and walk around without a new phone case?

To date, there is no clear understanding of how long this virus can survive outside living organisms: the very existence of the epidemic was recognized only weeks ago. Only general considerations can be made about whether this virus is capable of being transmitted with objects.

Normally, viruses are divided into "smart" and "strong". Durable have a shell that protects them well from the external environment. "Smart" - a large genome. 2019-nCoV is a rather “smart” virus, with a relatively long RNA (a record long in its class of viruses). Therefore, the shell protects him weakly: he lives in the owner, where it is already warm and cozy. Outdoors, they won't last long.

Russian delivery services - from, not to mention, "Post of Russia" to its commercial counterparts - do not work quickly. Almost certainly, by the time the package arrives, 2019-nCoV will die there. But to calm the conscience, the cover can be wiped with an alcohol wipe.

9. Is it more dangerous than swine and bird flu?

Depending on what is meant by these words. The fact is that the same "Spanish flu", according to some researchers, arose due to the recombination of the genes of the poultry and human influenza virus (H1N1 strain). Such a "hybrid" flu produced the most dangerous known viral epidemic in history, killing at least fifty million people.

However, usually no one knows about it. Following the media, bird and swine flu are called epidemics from China, which have been there periodically since the 1990s. "Avian" is called H5N1. It was less dangerous because it only spread normally from poultry (chickens) to humans, and from human to human it spread quite badly. However, if they still get sick, then the risk of death could exceed 50 percent, which is a lot. In total, 630 people were infected with it, 375 died.

Swine flu is referred to in the media as an influenza A/H1N1 pandemic. In fact, it is not certain that it was transmitted to humans from pigs - it is more likely that this is the result of the recombination of genes from one flu, typical for pigs, and another, typical for humans. In fact, this is an ordinary flu with a very low mortality rate among those who become ill (one in 3000), and, like with ordinary influenza, mortality is due to complications. Among those who fell ill with A / H1N1, 17 thousand died, which is a lot. But it is worth remembering that 250,000 people die every year from the flu (or rather, its complications) in the world, according to WHO estimates.

Of course, such a “pig” (but in fact it’s not - its epidemic has not been recorded among pigs) flu is much more dangerous than the new coronavirus in terms of total number dead. But those who got it in 2009-2010 had a 0.03 percent chance of dying. Among patients with 2019-nCoV, this probability is still nine percent, that is, 300 times higher.

10. Do people recover completely after it or do problems remain?

At the moment, this is unknown: the number of cases is too small. However, normally, after an unstarted viral pneumonia, the vast majority of those who have been ill do not have any problems.

11. How often do such viruses appear? Were they just as dangerous before?

Viruses transmitted from animals to humans appear periodically even in our time. For example, the Middle East respiratory syndrome, caused by another coronavirus, seems to have appeared already in the 21st century. In 2012-2017, two thousand people fell ill from it and more than 700 died.

The Middle East respiratory syndrome virus in 2012-2017 led to the death of hundreds of people, but by itself it spread poorly among them, infection from sick camels remained the main channel / © Wikimedia Commons

Initially, a person became infected from a sick one-humped camel, which is why most cases occurred on the Arabian Peninsula. However, in the age of globalization, such patients can often travel a long distance, so one person from Saudi Arabia brought the virus to South Korea where dozens died from it.

The emergence of new viruses of this kind is the norm. Most viruses have a much higher mutation rate than multicellular ones, and they often combine genetic material different strains, which leads to their high variability and often the emergence of new strains. Nevertheless, under the conditions of modern medicine, the number of victims from such viruses is quite small - on the order of hundreds per epidemic.

12. So is it worth it or not to panic in the end? Will a vaccine be found soon? Or maybe not find it at all?

There is no need to panic at all: as we noted above, negative emotions can seriously suppress your immunity, which will reduce its ability to fight. And not only with 2019-nCoV - a rather exotic disease - but also with the closer and more dangerous common flu, with its complications. And not just with the flu. Pneumonia of all types kills more than a quarter of a million people a year, and those with reduced immunity are more likely to be among them.

Already for the Middle East respiratory syndrome virus, relatively effective ways disease prevention through immunization. But, due to the rarity of the disease, no one carried out mass immunization / © Shutterstock

As for the vaccine, in theory it is "almost here". In laboratories, based on 2019-nCoV, coronaviruses of one reproduction cycle have been created. These can enter the body and even once create a copy of themselves there, but then cease to be active. This is, in fact, already a vaccine - thanks to the presence of 2019-nCoV of one reproduction cycle, the immune system learns to develop the desired response.

But there is a caveat: any vaccine requires lengthy tests of its complete safety, and this is not done quickly. And epidemics like SARS or its “relative” 2019-nCoV often end quickly. The same SARS lasted about a year. In such a short time, no one will establish any mass vaccination, therefore, most likely, the fight against the epidemic will be reduced to quarantine and treatment of those who are already sick. By analogy with SARS in 2002-2004.

A vaccine against a coronavirus that affects non-immune cells in the body can be made almost guaranteed. To make it difficult to create a vaccine for a virus, it must be of the HIV type - that is, it must attack not ordinary cells, but cells of the immune system. Roughly speaking, it is difficult for the “police” of an organism to catch a virus-criminal if it is ideally adapted specifically to hunting for “cops”.

Coronaviruses do not do this, therefore, specifically for a new epidemic, you should not be afraid of the impossibility of creating a vaccine.

13. They also say that the Americans could have made this virus, everything happened exactly on the Chinese New Year. Is there any truth in this?

Such rumors arise regularly: back in the days of SARS, two Russian researchers suggested that it was an American virus. However, after studying the RNA of the virus, such “hypotheses” dissolve like smoke.

RNA clearly shows that both SARS and the new 2019 coronavirus are close “relatives” of bat coronaviruses and poisonous snakes that live specifically in China. Moreover, they are sold in exotic food markets in Wuhan. It is precisely because 2019-nCoV arose from such a mixture of genes that it does not spread very well (according to the available data) among people.

If this virus were created artificially, then for such a result, its developers should have been fired for incompetence. A virus that doesn't spread well between people is a bad weapon.

If the "creators" made it easily transferred from person to person, they should have been fired all the more. SARS in 2002-2003 caused dozens of deaths in Canada. A highly contagious virus would easily reach the United States and cause an epidemic there as well. In the age of mass air travel, creating a virus for China means preparing an epidemic at home.

Theoretically, you can try to create a virus that will not infect people without special genes, and try to find such genes only in the Chinese. In practice, at the current technological level, this is about as realistic as the colonization of the Tau Ceti system is.

The available means of genome manipulation are too crude and imprecise to realize such an ambitious task. In addition, infections with the new coronavirus have already been registered in other countries, which excludes the version of the "anti-Chinese" biological weapons.

Going to school only for your favorite lessons is possible! Did you know about it? You can come to the second or third period, or attend school only three times a week instead of five, or not go to school at all, and still master the program perfectly.

Svetlana Marzeeva, the author of the Alternative Education in Russia portal and the founder of the Family Schools Club public organization, told the correspondent of MIR 24 about the wide opportunities the Law on Education provides for parents and children.

Three years ago, Svetlana called on parents and teachers to jointly educate their children in small groups, uniting on a territorial basis. Since then, there have been more than forty such groups in Moscow, and their number is constantly growing. For some, such a group is an alternative to a regular school, but for someone it is a real salvation. Here is what Svetlana had to say:

Now the law provides parents with literally unlimited opportunities in choosing an educational trajectory for their child. Many simply do not believe that it is possible not to attend the lessons of teachers who do not like, or simply unloved subjects, you can sleep in the morning if the child is a “night owl”, or attend lessons in several subjects at one school, but, say, in mathematics or chemistry - in another, where they teach more interestingly. It is only necessary to competently build relations with the school, somewhere to exercise their right, and somewhere to agree.

What does "agree" mean? Parents are used to being obliged to comply with all the requirements of the school. In what part can we negotiate with her?

In the part where the school itself makes decisions within the law. The fact is that the school is also given great rights and opportunities by the state. Any public school can choose not only educational programs, but also textbooks, can make attending classes free, can allow their students to study in several schools at once (in the law this is called "network learning"), can afford small classes, unusual subjects and the most modern techniques. I know it sounds fantastic, but it is completely in line with Russian law. Moreover, such schools existed before. For example, school No. 200 (humane pedagogy according to the system of academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Sh.A. Amonashvili), school No. 734 (school of self-determination of Alexander Tubelsky).

- Let's first talk in more detail about what is required by law, about which it is not necessary to agree.

Most importantly, parents have priority rights in the field of upbringing and education over other persons: see the Family Code and FZ-273. This means that you, as a parent who knows the inclinations and needs of the child, know better if he needs to do homework and go to school every day. You have the right to write a statement that you are asking to transfer your student "to study according to an individual curriculum" (Article 34 Part 1 of Federal Law 273-FZ), and then choose those subjects that you decide to attend at school. And the rest study at home and pass certification on them (that is, write one final control or take a test, or submit an essay). That's all, nothing more is needed for this - no arguments, no medical and other certificates, a statement from the parents is enough.

Exactly the same opportunities are given by a statement with the wording “I ask you to transfer my child to part-time form learning". But which of these two options to choose is already a subject of negotiations with the school. Previously, it was very difficult to get permission from the school not to attend certain lessons, because there were no such precedents, and they were perceived as some kind of eccentric trick.

But after some representatives of the administration of educational institutions lost their positions, they realized that this was not a joke and that parents really had good arguments and serious reasons. So, there are more and more students who attend classes at school only partially, and not only in the capital, but also in the regions.

What reasons do parents have to achieve such conditions, I would say special? After all, it has not yet become a mass phenomenon.

Over the years that I have been involved in my project, I have studied well the reasons why people turn to alternative education. The first is the health of the children. Second, the quality of their education.

The fact is that the school curriculum is based on memorization and at the same time is heavily overloaded with unnecessary and outdated information.

Many well-known teachers say that it is impossible to complete the amount of tasks that are required from children, starting from high school. "School program is not feasible!" - These words belong to Alexei Bitner, a former Novosibirsk teacher and director, who today helps students get rid of school, graduating from it as an external student.

Children who honestly try to remember everything experience constant stress. Therefore, the body is simply forced to turn on defense mechanisms - that is, diseases, and sometimes they are very serious, even incurable.

Those who have a more stable psyche have to turn on indifference, lie, pretend, skip or simply ignore all this constant violent information intoxication. Against this background, the lack of time for walks, reduced sleep, rest, the need to sit still for 8 hours a day - these are already “little things”.

It's about health. Now about education. Such a life kills interest not only in knowledge, but in general deprives one of energy and joy. That is, even important skills and information are not acquired by children. In addition, a lot of important things remain outside the school, which children are not taught.

They don’t teach conflict-free communication, they don’t teach to find a common language with other people, they don’t teach financial literacy. Career guidance, psychology, the basics of economics and business - all this has to be acquired outside of school. But when? If you go to school, then there is simply no time for it.

I remember when I was at school, we were asked to learn the ballad "Heather Honey" for the summer. My daughter was asked to do the same, but in three days. This is a very significant difference: everything is the same, only much faster. Because it added modern literature over the years, but nothing has been reduced, just reduced the study time.

In the public school system, parents do not delve so deeply into educational issues, but they see the tip of the iceberg - children in high school lose interest in learning. And in order to maintain motivation, and at the same time health and joy, they also come to the conclusion that it is necessary to reduce the time that the child spends on school. That is why we are in last years we are seeing such a surge of interest in alternative forms of education.

But what if the parents work and cannot take the child to school or are not ready to take responsibility for his education?

If we are talking about secondary school, then the responsibility for their own education is already within the power of teenagers. They no longer have such a passion for learning, like kids, but the motivation is still there. For example, they themselves consider a difficult or boring subject important. Or they want to test their strength. Or they need this knowledge for their future profession.

And if we are talking about elementary school, then everything is simpler there. In order to study successfully elementary school, it will be enough for someone to have a good teacher. After all, it is not by chance that everyone repeats: look not for a school, look for a teacher. And if someone wants more, then you can transfer the child to a family or distance learning, find a few like-minded people in your neighborhood and pool your money to hire a teacher to teach your children.

By the way, this is exactly what we did with several parents. This was in 2012, before the last law on education was passed. I did not come up with this scheme, the first such family school was invented and implemented on the basis of a circle for difficult teenagers by psychologist Boris Grechukhin - a bright, extraordinary and internally very free person.

And who would have come at that time with the seditious thought that "free mass education is the confiscation of children from their parents." But big words are easy to say. And what was it like to create your own school in the USSR? Moreover, stating: “No professional school teachers. Students and parents take care of children.

By that time, parents who opened the first class on the basis of their own private kindergarten had a similar experience, and we did. I conditionally called these groups of parents and teachers family schools, but this not very successful name stuck. Literally in four years of such non-schools more than fifty in Moscow and the Moscow region. And now there are such associations in St. Petersburg, and in Samara, and in Kaliningrad, and in many other cities of Russia.

Now in the capital and in St. Petersburg even the tiny experience of creating school-parks by Miloslav Balaban has appeared. These are schools of free attendance, where students themselves choose which classes (studios) they attend. Once upon a time, such an experiment was first staged at school No. 734.

Literally over the past two years, another option for alternative education in the beginning has appeared: these are the Zhokhov classes. Vladimir Ivanovich Zhokhov - Honored Teacher of the Russian Federation, author of school textbooks, developed a methodology for teaching in elementary school. Oddly enough, many public school principals have taken on the responsibility of opening such classes. That is, some alternative methods already have support in the form of state schools.

- What other opportunities, not noticed by the broad masses, has the law on education given us?

The Federal Law on Education includes full-time, part-time, family and distance learning. And there is also a network form that allows you to study in several schools at once. And if the first four are used in one way or another, then the last one is just beginning to be mastered by parents and schools. All schools (both private and public) can enter into agreements on networking. This means that the student can study in different school subjects in different schools if they have entered into an agreement between them.

For example, a private International School Tomorrow(MShZD) forms remote classes that are taught Russian remotely according to the methodology of Olga Soboleva and under her methodological guidance. So far, only this Russian school has such an opportunity, but children from any corner of Russia can study in it.

With this form of education, students may not attend Russian classes at their primary school: the grades they receive at the MSHS are counted there. They appear in the report cards and the personal file of the student.

It is unfortunate that such promising forms of education are still little used. But it's so great that they exist, that our state has legally taken care of this.

Well, if a child studies at home in some subjects, then how and who controls his knowledge, and will such free treatment of the school curriculum lead to a decrease in the quality of knowledge? After all, parents can rarely objectively assess the level of knowledge of their children.

For those subjects that the child attends partially, control, surveys and other numerous so-called. slices of knowledge. And for those subjects that the child does not attend, schools control the level of knowledge through assessments. They can be one, two, three times a year, at the discretion of the parent and wherever he wants - even in a public school, even in a private school.

If you are guided by the law, then de jure only the GIA and the Unified State Examination are obligatory. But de facto, our parents and their children still prefer to pass certifications annually or every six months in those subjects that the child does not attend. Firstly, to be sure that he is successfully mastering the program, and secondly, to have documents confirming this on hand.

- Why do many schools hardly agree to such experiments?

Many, probably, would not agree, but they are obliged by law. I think that parents are not ready for this first of all. For example, theoretically, a school has the right to start teaching not at 8.30, which, in my opinion, is unhealthy, but at 9.30 or 10.00.

I remember how we told the director of a cool lyceum about the success of the children, from where we took the children to teach them on our own. And she told us: “Of course, because they get enough sleep!”. She herself understands the benefits of this, but she cannot make the start time later, because every morning at 8.00 and even earlier, children are brought to the door of a closed school, whose parents have nowhere to go. That is, educational establishments simply respond to parent requests. If the principal of my daughter's school allows free attendance for everyone, his parents will eat him alive!

The deputy director of one of the schools in Tsaritsyno recently told me that it was the parents who opposed free school attendance when they wanted to introduce it in this school. Then this wonderful teacher, candidate historical sciences, introduced free attendance only in his lessons.

For the first two weeks, no one came to him at all! Children simply could not believe in such a "laugh". And then they began to look, more and more often. And then history became a favorite subject for many. Children will not drop out of school if they are no longer forced to go there. They will simply do it for their own benefit.

Tatyana Rubleva

ON THE FORCE OF HABIT

Participants in a survey conducted by the Rambler analytical service commissioned by MIR 24 told what form of secondary education they consider the most appropriate for a child.

The majority of respondents (70%) support the existing school system in Russia. They answered that the most correct form of secondary education is "standard - like everyone else."

20% of respondents voted for the option “alternative education with an individual approach”. 1168 respondents took part in the voting.

In third place in popularity (8%) was the option that suggests that some of the lessons can be studied at school, and some at home. Least of all respondents (2%) considered it right to study at home without going to school.

"Once upon a time, those who did not go to school were uneducated. And now it is just the opposite ... "(French novelist Paul Gu).

Many women, when they become mothers, decide that they will give their child the most important thing - childhood. In other words, they will not break his nature. They won’t force you to stand when you want to run, they won’t make you sit down if you want to stand, they won’t drive you home when you want to play outside. They will not brush aside his desire to receive answers to their questions. Nevertheless, setting priorities in favor of educating a free personality in a child in fact often leads to a serious conflict with the entire school education system. It is interesting, by the way, that the very word "school", which is often associated with sleepless nights, poor health, dubious knowledge, is actually translated as "leisure".

School education - solid cons?

For centuries, children have been taught at home. Parents either educated themselves or hired special teachers and a tutor for this purpose. The situation changes only with the onset of the nineteenth century, when schools in the form familiar to us replace the then home schooling. By the way, the modern look of these schools is not criticized, probably only by the lazy. First of all, the school system is accused of discouraging children from learning. The material is presented very monotonously in an extremely tedious manner. In lessons where there are 30 people at the same time, the teacher, with all his desire, cannot see an individual student. As a result, the child gets tired, loses all interest in the educational process.

Learning is natural for a child. Any preschooler is ready to torture his parents half to death with eternal "why" and "why". Parents are ready to buy all the children's toys in Moscow for a curious baby, only to stop the flow of his questions. However, sitting down at a desk, curiosity, interest and thirst for answers disappear somewhere. Why? Because of the same erroneous system. The schoolboy is extremely overburdened with all sorts of bureaucratic burdens. But seriously, we, for example, do not observe a direct connection between the counting of cells between completed tasks and the development of the Pythagorean theorem. One thing is clear: Leonardo da Vinci modern educators would be branded as an absolutely mediocre person, not even able to write from left to right, as all normal people do.

In addition, a system where one adult (not always with excellent moral abilities) for many years becomes the Lord God for a little man leads to numerous discrimination and humiliation of that child who dared to be different from others, or simply did not like class teacher… Nervous breakdowns, broken psyches, suicides are side effects of today's education.

Another sign of our time is the broken health of the younger generation. Forced imprisonment in one place, carrying heavy backpacks, homework until dawn, mental overload, ideological hours do their job. Here is a list of the inevitable companions of our children: respiratory diseases, digestive disorders, diseases of the skeletal system, diseases of the circulatory system. So is schooling only causing harm? A lot of people will agree with this.

Homeschooling as an alternative to school

So what is the way out here? Unless you take your child to school. Some parents do just that. Moreover, the popularity of homeschooling is gaining momentum. The leaders in this area are Canada and the United States. Thus, in Canada in 1980 only about 3,000 children were homeschooled. In 2003, there were already 77,523 such children, or 3.8% of the total number of registered students.

In the United States in 1985, only 50,000 children were homeschooled. In 1993 there were already 300,000 of them. In 2008, several million. Today, 4.4 to 7.4% of all US students are homeschooled. In 2006, a special survey was conducted among North American parents who spoke in favor of transferring their children to home schooling in order to identify their motivation. So, they chose this form of training because:

1. It makes it possible for the child to lay his own system of values;
2. building tight and strong bonds between parents and children;
3. Gives the opportunity for the child to communicate with adults and children at the highest level;
4. Allows you to get rid of Guarantees the best academic performance;
5. Provides an opportunity to avoid negative influences(drugs, alcohol, early sex) through controlled positive peer contact;
6. Provides a physically more favorable learning environment.

In Russia, the home education system is not yet widespread. However, to say that it does not exist is not necessary. Parents who decide not to send their child to school take advantage of the fact that the general educational institutions of our country can provide "external certification for persons who receive general basic and secondary education on their own." Permission for home education in Russia was secured already in 1992 by decree of the then President Russian Federation. At the same time, Russian schools are obliged to contribute to the desire of parents to educate their children at home. At the moment, there are numerous websites and associations in our country aimed at helping families who choose to receive education at home for their children. In addition, according to Russian law, such parents are even entitled to payments from the state.