License No. 1961 dated February 18, 2016 00:00, valid indefinitely.
Accreditation No. 1912 dated 05/10/2016 00:00, valid until 07/08/2019 00:00.
And about. Rector: Shevtsov Vyacheslav Alekseevich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor Education
1977 - MAI, Faculty of Aircraft Radio Electronics
1986 - Postgraduate
1987 - Ph.D. thesis defense, Ph.D.
2004 - defense of a doctoral dissertation on the topic: "Signal processing against the background of non-Gaussian interference in telecommunication systems and networks", Doctor of Technical Sciences.
2007 - professor
Career
1978-1980 - service in the SA, senior lieutenant engineer
since 1981 at MAI - engineer, graduate student, head of the educational laboratory, deputy dean for research
1980-1990 - All-Russian Research Institute of the State Patent Examination, freelance expert
2001-2007 - Dean of the Faculty of Aircraft Radio Electronics
2007-2016 - Vice-Rector for Research
2016 - acting Rector of MAI
Publications
Author and co-author of over 50 scientific works, including 15 invention certificates, a patent for new way cellular communication, 3 monographs: “Signal processing against the background of non-Gaussian interference in telecommunication systems and networks”, “Optimal signal processing large systems”, “Place of determination of subscribers in cellular communication systems”, “General system issues of information security”.
Awards
Laureate of the Prize of the Government of the Russian Federation in the field of science and technology
Medal "In memory of the 850th anniversary of Moscow"
Sign " Honorary Worker systems higher education»
Other
Academic Secretary of the International Academy of Information Sciences, Processes and Technology
Deputy Chairman of the editorial board of the journal "Vestnik MAI"
Chairman of the dissertation council
Member of the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission
Honorary Doctor of the Higher Technical School Esslingen (Germany)
Vice-Rector for Extracurricular and Educational Work: Yurov Nikolay Nikolaevich, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
vice rector for international relations and security: Miknis Vitaly Ivanovich
Vice-Rector for Quality and Informatization: Yury Ivanovich Deniskin, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor Yury Ivanovich Deniskin was born on July 30, 1961 in the city of Vladivostok in a family of employees.
After graduating in 1978 high school entered and graduated with honors in 1984 from the Far Eastern Polytechnic Institute (now the Far Eastern State Technical University) with a degree in Ship Power Plants.
Since 1984, he began working at the Moscow Aviation Institute as a trainee teacher at the 905 department.
In 1985 he entered full-time graduate school at the Moscow Aviation Institute, in 1989 he defended his thesis for degree candidate of technical sciences, specialty 05.01.01 "Applied geometry and engineering graphics". In 2000 he graduated from the MAI doctoral studies and defended his doctoral dissertation in the specialty 05.01.01.
Specialist in the field of geometric modeling of objects and processes, information technologies, quality management and information support life cycle complex high technology products.
Since 2001 - Professor of Department 905, since 2007 - Vice-Rector of the MAI for Quality and Informatization.
Supervises graduate and doctoral students.
Organizer and Chief Editor electronic journal"Applied Geometry" MAI. Deputy Chairman of the Doctoral Specialized Council in the specialty 05.01.01, member of the Doctoral Specialized Council at MAI.
Professional teacher in the field of quality, has a diploma of the GOST R Certification System (April 1999). Certified specialist in the principles and methods of total quality management (TQM), certificate of the Institute for Quality Assurance (IQA, England, January 2001).
Since 2001, he has been a part-time professor of department 104.
Vice-Rector for Economics and Finance: Gorelov Boris Alekseevich
Vice-Rector for the Development of the Institute Complex and Social Issues: Gavrilova Inna Semenovna, Vice-Rector for the Development of the Institute Complex and Social Issues
Vice-Rector for Research: Shevtsov Vyacheslav Alekseevich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor Education
1977 - MAI, Faculty of Aircraft Radio Electronics
1986 - Postgraduate
1987 - Ph.D. thesis defense, Ph.D.
2004 - defense of a doctoral dissertation on the topic: "Signal processing against the background of non-Gaussian interference in telecommunication systems and networks", Doctor of Technical Sciences.
2007 - professor
Career
1978-1980 - service in the SA, senior lieutenant engineer
since 1981 at MAI - engineer, graduate student, head of the educational laboratory, deputy dean for research
1980–1990 - VNII of the State Patent Examination, freelance expert
2001–2007 - Dean of the Faculty of Aircraft Radio Electronics
2007 - Vice-Rector for Research
Prepared 2 candidates of sciences.
Publications
Author and co-author of more than 50 scientific papers, including 15 invention certificates, a patent for a new method of cellular communication, 3 monographs: “Signal processing against the background of non-Gaussian interference in telecommunication systems and networks”, “Optimal signal processing by large systems”, “Location determination of subscribers in cellular communication systems”, “General system issues of information security”.
Awards
Laureate of the Prize of the Government of the Russian Federation in the field of science and technology
Medal "In memory of the 850th anniversary of Moscow"
Badge "Honorary Worker of the Higher Education System"
Other
Academic Secretary of the International Academy of Information Sciences, Processes and Technology
Deputy Chairman of the editorial board of the journal "Vestnik MAI"
Chairman of the dissertation council
Member of the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission
Honorary Doctor of the Higher Technical School Esslingen (Germany)
Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs: Kuprikov Mikhail Yuryevich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor Kuprikov M. Yu. - a specialist in the field of system analysis of large and complex technical systems, in terms of automating the formation of the appearance of aviation complexes; author 256 scientific papers, 127 of which were published including a monograph, 49 articles and 9 copyright certificates for inventions.
Main areas of research: applied information support for product life cycle automation, continuous product life cycle support (CALS), automation of design and development work, the impact of infrastructure restrictions on the appearance of an aircraft, automated formation of an aircraft appearance, solid-state, hybrid and parametric modeling of products and processes in mechanical engineering , staffing continuous product life cycle support. M. Yu. Kuprikov contributed fundamental results in the theory mathematical solution problems of forming the geometric appearance of large and complex technical systems under "hard" constraints by transforming these problems into "inverse" design problems.
Kuprikov M.Yu. (as part of a team of authors) developed and implemented a system for automated formation of the appearance of vertical take-off and landing aircraft at OKB A.S. Yakovlev, the design results of which were reflected in the appearance of promising aircraft carrier strike groups. New results were obtained by M. Yu. Kuprikov in the field of development of long-haul aircraft with large passenger capacity, systems for the collective rescue of passengers and aircraft crew. With his direct participation, the tasks of identifying the impact of environmental (noise and emissions) and demographic requirements on the appearance of advanced aircraft were solved. He developed applied scientific and methodological support for the training of personnel support for continuous support of the life cycle of products for the aviation industry, implemented in MAI, KhAI, MATI, V.A.T.U. N. E. Zhukovsky, TANTK named after G. M. Beriev, ANTK named after A. N. Tupolev, OKB Kamov, OKB Sukhoi, RAC MiG, NPO PROGRESTEKH.
Kuprikov M. Yu. is the editor-in-chief of the journal “Applied Geometry, Engineering Graphics, Computer Design” (http://jggd.ru), a member of the editorial boards of the journal “Quality of Life”, chairman of the specialized Council D 212.125.13 of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation (specialty 05.01. 01 and 05.13.12), member of the Council D 212.125.10 of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation (specialty 05.02.02 3), Scientific Secretary of the Council DC 212.005.02 of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation (specialty 05.07.02). Under the guidance of Kuprikov M. Yu., 5 candidate and 1 doctoral dissertations were defended.
In 1982, after graduating from high school with a gold medal, he entered the Moscow aviation institute. He graduated with honors from the Moscow Aviation Institute in 1988 with a degree in aircraft engineering (mechanical engineer). In 1989-1992 he completed postgraduate studies at the Moscow Aviation Institute and received the qualification of an engineer-researcher. In 1993 he defended his dissertation on a special topic. Assignment of the degree of candidate of technical sciences in the specialty 05.07.02 "Design and construction of aircraft". In 1995-1998 he studied at the MAI doctoral program, after graduating, in 2000 he defended his thesis for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences in the specialty 05.07.02 "Design, construction and production of aircraft" on the topic "Structural-parametric synthesis of the appearance of a vertical aircraft takeoff and landing."
Professional experience:
1985-1987 - art. OSKBES MAI technician (part-time),
1988-1990 - engineer, junior researcher "Problem Laboratory" of the Department 101 of the MAI "Aircraft Design";
1988–1990 Engineer at MMZ “SPEED” im. A. S. Yakovleva (part-time worker);
1994 - leading designer of AOOT OKB im. A. S. Yakovleva;
1995 - present - Deputy Dean of the Aviation Technology Faculty of the Moscow Aviation Institute;
1992 - present - Assistant, Senior Lecturer, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department 101 "Aircraft Design",
2006- present - Leading Specialist (part-time worker) of JSC Sukhoi Design Bureau;
1998 - present - Head of Department 904 "Engineering Graphics" MAI.
In 2000 awarded academic title Professor at the Department of Engineering Graphics.
Awards: medal "In memory of the 850th anniversary of Moscow" in 1997, Breastplate of the Ministry of Education Russian Federation"For the development of research work of students" in 2000 (ten medals of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation following the results of an open All-Russian competition for the best research work in 1992-1993 , 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2005), Golden medal Salon of Inventions "Archimedes 2003", Air Force Commemorative Medal "100 Years of Air Chief Marshal A. E. Golovanov" 2004, Badge "90 Years of Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Air Force" 2004, Medal of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation "For Labor Valor" 2005 G.
As you remember, recently I got hooked on the topic of revelations in the capital's education. True, before that, my posts related to corruption in the Moscow Department of Education. However, not indifferent readers decided to plant materials not always about the Department and not always about corruption. In general, they began to send me topics for posts regarding ANY problems in the capital's education. I will publish the most interesting materials.
So, the topic of today's post is how to get sick leave and serve it in Cyprus?
This blooming tanned man against the backdrop of a white ship is not at all Ostap Bender in Rio. Meet Miknis Vitaly Jonovich, or in the Russian way Vitaly Ivanovich,.
At the end of April of this year, the vice-rector suddenly realized that he was terribly tired of all these stupid students. So tired that staying in Moscow became unbearable. And somewhere in the Mediterranean latitudes, the beach temperature was already caressing the body, palm trees were waving their leaves invitingly, and the sand burned the heels of sunbathers. This sand burned the heels and soul not only of tourists relaxing on the beaches, but also of Vice-Rector Miknis, who is in Moscow.
Vitaly Ivanovich from the obsessive thought that he and the beach are in completely different regions, got so upset that he fell ill. Yes, so hard that I had to go on sick leave. Surgeon Kuchenkov A.V. decided that Vitaly Ivanovich did not look well, and signed him a sick leave from April 29 to May 8 inclusive.
You can view the document in full size
It was possible, of course, to do without sick leave, since the time exactly coincided with May holidays. But the working days between holidays spoiled the whole picture and made it difficult to go away from Moscow. Away - that means to Cyprus, where, with the support of a surgeon and a fake sick leave, Miknis flew on flight HH 8751 of the VIM-Avia airline to treat his shattered nerves. Here you have warming up the organs with stones, and washing the nose with salt water right in the waves, and cleansing the vessels with a glass of wine. And such therapy for a whole week. It is good that this hospitable republic has given us back such a valuable cadre for our education. In good health and good spirits, Vitaly Ivanovich arrived on flight GL-604 of Globus Airlines to Moscow on May 7th. The disease was swept away as if by hand, and the sick leave could be closed ...
Judging by the profile photos of Miknis in social networks, Vitaly Ivanovich generally loves to travel. In general, I do not see anything vicious in this predilection. However, I hope that he made all the rest of his trips during a legal vacation, and not a fictitious sick leave.
Taking this opportunity, I want to draw the attention of the new Minister of Education, Olga Yuryevna Vasilyeva, to the material posted by me and stop the occurrence of such incidents that disgrace the capital's universities, which all others are equal to educational establishments Russia.
PreobrazhenskyMay 17, 2016 7:34AM
Shvonder Inna Semyonovna (Shevtsov, Kozorez, Pogosyan) - the end of the MAI.
brutusMar 27, 2016 9:58AM
There were two universities: the legendary MAI, from scientific activity which shuddered and froze in a reverent trance the entire research environment, and absolutely ineffective, generally gone into the red in all respects, MATI. Nevertheless, after the reorganization of the MAI, which now combined two institutes under its loud name, by order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Dmitry Livanov, A.V. Rozhdestvensky, before that the rector of an absolutely ineffective MATI, was appointed acting rector. What's the point, you ask? Why and why was A. N. Gerashchenko, so beloved by everyone, removed and some strange and dubious uncle was appointed? Here's why.
From 2007 to 2015, MAI, although de jure under the leadership of Gerashchenko, was de facto at the disposal of a completely different person, namely Gavrilova Inna Semyonovna. Candidate of Economic Sciences with a dissertation defended in the Closed Council, but at the same time responsible for the entire economy of the institute for eight years. Let's ask our economist some questions. Where is the equipment purchased with funds from the research university development program? Where did the funds go? Junk in all departments and faculties. And what about paid services for students? If you want to go to the gym, pay a coin; there is no coin - go to the smelly basement with a socket on the ceiling. Climbers come to the climbing wall at night to practice, paying themselves subscriptions for a month in advance. And you, dorms, in the next building sleep with open doors. Do you want to live in a MAI hostel with your whole family, although you are not even a student? No problem, a couple of gold coins and a junior suite is at your service. About studying: God forbid that a good teacher gets caught, then at least they won’t take a tax on exams from excellent students in gold, but in general, almost everyone takes it. Do you want to study at MAI? Get your wallet ready. And you, students, keep on shouting for the old leadership, you had a good “rector”, the main thing is that you didn’t ruin anything, like some kind of Rozhdestvensky with his MATI.
New and. O. the rector was hounded from the very first day. And you, the brave warriors of the Internet, and colleagues in the shop. And who exactly from the workshop and from whose submission, in fact, do you want to know? Rozhdestvensky left the vice-rector for studies and the vice-rector for science. Two production workers on whom the university system should be based. The Vice-Rector for Economic Affairs (Inna Semyonovna, dear!) and the Vice-Rector for Security were fired. And for some reason, everyone was extremely upset by this fact of dismissal, although I bet that none of the representatives of the student body knows Mrs. Gavrilova by sight. Nevertheless, the community raised a fuss: a new rector has arrived, this is a raider takeover! Okay, but let me tell you a little secret written in the Law: in general, when leaving the post of the rector himself, all vice-rectors leave automatically. Automatically means right away, with him, yes. Because that's how it is. But if a person does not know how to read and / or does not want to, then for him it is legal, not legal - everything is the same, everything is seizure, robbery and lawlessness. What is the capture? That a person was removed from his position, who is not really responsible for anything, and two people who were absolutely unqualified from the point of view of the educational process were fired? Well, tragedy.
And then - more interesting. Having adjusted the situation in such a way that the post of rector became free again, on a chic SUV, in sables and with a bag worth the annual salary of a professor from the Moscow State University department, the old-new vice-rector for economic work rides through the territory from all the gramophones of the institute to the “farewell of a Slav” and rejoices: "I'm back!". The revelry, fun begins, because how is it - the housekeeper, but what really, the Mistress, has returned! IN government agency to work, like a merchant in her private shop. And in the shop they sell positions, all the “old” employees are fired as soon as possible. Hurry up before it's over! And new and Oh, V. A. Shevtsov, meanwhile quietly sitting in the rector's office and meekly answers all questions: "Everything will be as Inna Semyonovna says." I wonder why bloggers haven’t ordered a video about him yet.
Professors, students - you are adults worthy people. How can you allow yourself to be humiliated like this? The change in the leadership of the MAI was carried out with the aim of pulling the once great institute out of the quagmire in which it was mired during the years of management by incompetent people who care about their personal, not student, welfare, and bring it to a qualitatively new level. As a result, everything returned to normal: the leadership is the same, that is, familiar to you, and the mess will be the same. And what happens next is up to you.
L.IVANOVMar 26, 2016 9:55AM
An interesting situation is developing in the Ministry of Education and Science. In a week, Minister Livanov had two emergency situations in the department. One case for Far East, where the diplomat, intelligence officer, and the rector of the Far East University and the former deputy in charge of department Livanov, were put under house arrest, accused of allegedly stealing 20 million rubles from contracts, almost 700 million for the information system of the Far Eastern University. And, the second state of emergency, on the night from Thursday to Friday.
The rector of the MAI, Rozhdestvensy, who was appointed by Livanov’s order to this place only five months ago, quickly left or was expelled from his post. The intrigue with Rozhdestvensky fell out in the media due to the fact that he had to confront the clan and the powerful support group of Academician Poghosyan, behind which stands the Boeing Corporation, and those who would not want domestic aircraft in the skies over Russia.
gogaMar 26, 2016 8:47AM
all schemes are standard for universities in general, MAI is not unique here. Here is what we managed to collect over the years of work around the country:
1. In R&D, which are actually carried out by the staff of the departments, a bunch of performers are added from above, who do not really relate to the work in any way. Formally, everything is clean. In fact, it is possible to bring someone to clean water by interviewing all the performers prescribed in the report when submitting research to the commission.
2. Scheme" dead Souls"when people are registered as authors in order to increase the budget, and then according to the statements, all authors receive money, but in life none of them even know that they are registered somewhere, and they are given money, and they are something that should be done.
3. Scheme "dead souls ++". Clause 2, but now employees are already being paid money (because they found out!), But part of this money is returned in cash back. Everything is strictly voluntary.
The rest I will not write. All this can be opened for one or two. If they do not open it, then the fish goes out from the head.
By the way, speaking for MAI, it is surprising but true that MAI still does not have a supercomputer. It's just amazing, but the university, which positions itself as a leading aviation company, generally bypasses this issue. Something was bought back in the old days, but in the end, even all this is not clear how it is used.
But, for example, the same Sadovnichiy at Moscow State University took the first supercomputer with funds from profits. The same Livanov claims that many universities in the country and the Moscow Aviation Institute are also quite capable of acquiring a lot of things from their profits. But that doesn't happen. In my opinion this is a disgrace. The people in the Design Bureau are groaning from the lack of calculations, and there is simply a huge field for activity.
goat, youMar 26, 2016 8:23AM
Hundreds of agreements hung, from which all technota and departments and faculties were fed. Who will deal with such a university now? Corporations will run away from making deals with at least something with MAI. Podlyana, kidok in the middle of the year, what will happen by August? Will everyone be squeezed and cut down? Faculties will be merged, departments will be swept away and compressed? What's left!? And the investigators will sit in the offices in the SAC?! And drag professors to surveys?
IL96Mar 26, 2016 8:08AM
The Rozhdestvensky team left behind such mines for the remnants of embezzlers and corrupt officials in the united university that - mother, do not worry! THEY sat, and only picked: where, what and when - it was stolen, hidden, plundered. They themselves fled, and now they will go to the inspection bodies as WITNESSES and point the finger at who stole what. MAI will receive a return, students will not go to study in such a garbage dump in the summer and Academician Ryzhov’s nightmare will come true - MAI will be transferred to Istra, Lukhovitsy or Dmitrov, on the square of closed institutes, and in Leningradka, they will build something good, such as Food City for the poor. Now there is a transport hub, as they will start up the ring railway. metro.
dormouseMar 25, 2016 1:45PM
I have only one question for Comrade Medvedev - when will all the ministries be handed over to Shoigu? Then comrade (as Stalin loved this word!) Medvedev will be able to devote himself to his favorite hobby of photography.
MATI maticMar 25 2016 12:50PM
Mar 25 2016 12:02PM
The clan of security officials (except for the FSB) and the military-industrial complex represented by Shoigu, Livanov, Rogozin and generals dreaming of a sky for pilots has suffered a complete failure, so far! Did not provide power and administrative support, for the appointee, merged it. But the clan itself is in shit! Why are such cadres unable to work in conditions of turbulence and the growing influence of the "Washington Regional Committee" on the "Rising from its knees" RF? Will they be weak?
And how did the FSB deal with the general of the SVR, the former deputy minister Livanov for the Ministry of Education and Science and the rector of the Far Eastern University, Ivanets until last week? Sits, sick, under house arrest, for stealing 20 million rubles. The stern base becomes small and unreliable and people, even with a roof and from a clip of power, are fired like matches in the wind! Exactly, the last Christmas was celebrated, as the Pope says!
dry boyMar 25 2016 12:48PM
The former rector of MATI - MAI A. Rozhdestvensky is closely connected with aviation, and not an upstart and a stranger in the aviation environment, as his ill-wishers at MAI claim.
The father of the rector of the MAI Rozhdestvensky served at Baikonur in the launch group of missiles. On October 24, 1960, the second stage of the R-16 rocket was launched. At the start, more than a hundred people died in hellish flames. Among the dead was Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces Chief Marshal of Artillery M. I. Nedelin.
Rozhdestvensky's family keeps the key to the auxiliary room of this rocket, which was never needed. And his father, who was not old, survived.
And the grandfather of the “non-aviation” appointee to the rectors of MATI - MAI was Rozhdestvensky Khristofor Aleksandrovich Major General of the Navy Aviation. Head of the Yeysk Military Aviation School for Pilots from 1953 to 1956.
UDC 338.4
Fedulov Vladimir Ivanovich
PhD student at the Institute of Engineering Economics and the Humanities
Tikhonov Alexey Ivanovich
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
Head Department of "Personnel Management"
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow
Gavrilova Inna Semyonovna
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of the Department of Production Management and Marketing, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow
Fedulov Vladimir I.
Graduate Institute of Engineering Economics and Humanities
Tikhonov Alexey I.
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
Head of Department "Human Resource Management"
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow
Gavrilova Inna S.
Candidate of Economical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department “Production management and marketing” Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow
Modern experience and problems of forming a system for monitoring working conditions at the enterprise
Modern experience and problems of formation of systemof monitoring of working conditions at the enterprise
annotation. The article discusses the state of conditions and labor protection at modern domestic enterprises. The monitoring system should determine the level of injury and the establishment of disability due to injury or disease; state examination of working conditions; a number of measures aimed at preventing accidents; training of specialists and training of workers in labor protection. implementation of forecasting the development of the most important processes in the field of labor protection. Monitoring will ensure the implementation of the main directions of state policy in the field of conditions and labor protection.
summary. In article the condition of conditions and labor protection at the modern domestic enterprises are surveyed. The system of monitoring has to determine the level of traumatism and establishment of disability owing to a mutilation or a disease; state examination of working conditions; a series of the actions referred to on prophylaxis of accidents; training of specialists and training of workers in labor protection. exercise of forecasting of development of the major processes in the sphere of labor protection. Carrying out monitoring will allow to provide realization of the main directions of state policy in the field of conditions and labor protection.
Keywords: monitoring, working conditions, labor protection, personnel management, management, administration, enterprise, corporation.
keywords: monitoring, working conditions, labor protection, human resource management, management, management, enterprise, corporation.
Any enterprise that meets the criteria of a modern organization, regardless of the direction of its activities, the characteristics of the production process, the chosen vector of development and its own scale, is a socio-economic system. The systemic nature of the object implies the presence of interconnected constituent elements, each of which is an integral and complementary part of its design as a whole, creating an integral systemic totality. The main aggregate components of the organization of production processes and the enterprise as a socio-economic unit are the mechanisms of production, accounting and analysis of factors of the internal and external environment, the concept of production management, organizational climate, personnel and financial policy implemented by management, etc. Among these elements, which together form an integral structure of the organization of production at the enterprise, the protection and observance of the working conditions of personnel are separately distinguished.
The solution of issues related to the organization of labor protection at enterprises has a dualistic nature. On the one hand, the introduction of mechanisms designed to regulate this area of production process management is the prerogative of the state. First of all, this concerns the states that are members of the International Labor Organization (ILO), a specialized agency of the United Nations engaged in the development and implementation of theoretical and applied tools that are directly related to the regulation and coordination of labor relations. The Russian Federation is a member of the ILO, the first convention in our country was ratified in the Soviet period in 1921 (Convention No. 10 “On the minimum age for admission of children to work in agriculture"). Main normative documents, adopted by the ILO in 2006 and containing recommendations and fundamental directions for the organization of labor protection are considered the Convention "On the basis for the promotion of advanced organization of labor protection at the national level" (No. 187) and the "Recommendation on the basis for the promotion of advanced organization of labor protection at the national level" (No. 197 ).
The activity of the state in the field of labor protection, first of all, is manifested in the form of the creation and implementation of national programs that contain practical mechanisms for regulating such aspects and are of a strategic nature. As a rule, the primary content of such programs is the supervision of compliance with labor laws, accounting and prevention of accidents at work, public control, social partnership and the international cooperation in the field of labor relations, as well as the development of recommendations for establishing priority areas and improving working conditions.
Another pole of the system of protection and compliance with working conditions at the enterprise is the activity carried out directly within the production organization. It is carried out by all the constituent elements of the economic unit and has an interconnected, integration character, covering the vectors of horizontal and vertical interaction between the components of the organizational structure of the enterprise. The need for such actions is manifested due to the fact that, despite the complexity and comprehensive orientation of programs adopted at the state level, the essence of such documents is too standardized and, due to the need to cover the entire set of socio-economic objects located on the territory of the country, is concentrated mainly on external influence. In turn, when implementing internal organizational measures for the protection and observance of working conditions, factors reflecting the specifics of a particular enterprise as a socio-economic system should be taken into account.
Nevertheless, both external (state) and internal (organizational) activities in the formation of a managerial system for regulating labor relations are closely interconnected with each other. Elements of the structure of the enterprise often borrow a number of mechanisms and aspects from government programs and recommendations - of course, in addition to mandatory ones, according to labor legislation; in this case, the term "borrowing" is not appropriate - introducing them into the internal structure, taking into account the peculiarities of the production process (first of all, such actions are typical for large industrial enterprises).
Rice. 1. The relationship of state and intra-organizational activities in the system of labor organization.
One of modern trends in the field of labor relations management, which has already been reflected in state policy and is of interest to the management personnel of the enterprise and the study of issues organizational management, is the experience of creating a system for monitoring working conditions. It should be noted that in the presence of common approaches to the formation of such a system, monitoring implemented at the state level, the priority aspect of which is the comprehensive monitoring of socio-economic objects on the geographical scale of the country, differs significantly from the level of enterprises, that is, the case when monitoring is aimed to optimize and improve the organization of production and needs a clear study and implementation of the applied model. Monitoring, in this case, should be understood as a complex method of collecting information and making appropriate decisions, implying observation, data analysis, the presence of various elements of the organizational environment as subjects, the development and implementation of operational and strategic activities.
The main problems of creating a system for monitoring working conditions at an enterprise are primarily related to its non-universality, which makes it difficult to use the existing positive experience - domestic and foreign - as well as the cost of introducing new mechanisms into the established practice of the production process. In such conditions, innovative concepts for the functioning of modern enterprises come to the rescue. Such approaches include the presentation of a complex socio-economic organization as a quasi-corporation.
A quasi-corporation, in this case, is an association of persons that has a number of features of a corporation that determine its activities, while legally such an association is not a corporation, although in some cases it is recognized as such (in foreign practice). The approach to the analysis of the activities of an enterprise as a quasi-corporation necessitates the allocation of structural groups of the organization's personnel as "participants" in corporate activities. As a rule, such a division occurs by industry, duties performed and the main functions of employees. The personnel of the enterprise, according to this approach, can be divided into technical personnel, support personnel, employees, middle managers (usually they mean heads of departments) and senior management personnel. Such a division is not mandatory or strictly defined, it is used primarily for convenience.
According to the designated concept, the enterprise adopts the following features of the corporation:
- is an association of persons characterized by group interests;
- such an organization is characterized by a complex structure and the presence of a system, not only vertical, but also horizontal connections;
- suggests a high degree personal and collective responsibility;
- corporate units are united by a common constructive purpose, while the quasi-corporate form implies a broader focus on the personal needs of employees;
- an indirect feature can be considered a high level of corporate culture, in this case, meaning not so much a favorable intra-group social climate as a well-developed system of interaction between groups, designed to increase the efficiency of the production process.
One of the specific features of the described concept of a modern enterprise is also a shift in the management style towards an authoritarian one. highest level, which significantly changes the process of acceptance management decisions, and towards liberal at the level of the internal quasi-corporate group, which is explained by the need to match the working conditions of employees to their intra-group wishes, which are not developed collectively, but depend directly on the place of the group in the designated structure.
It is the quasi-corporate concept that implies a new, more involved approach in some elements of the organization of production, including in relation to issues related to the working conditions of personnel. In addition to the existing system of compliance with working conditions based on accepted standards, there is a need to form a model for monitoring these conditions.
Rice. 2. Model for monitoring working conditions at the enterprise, according to the quasi-corporate concept.
The development and implementation of a model for monitoring working conditions in an enterprise, along with other areas of management activity, is designed to meet the needs of employees and clearly define their role in the internal structure of the organization. This direction of production management makes it possible to increase the efficiency of the functioning of the elements of the intraorganizational structure by expanding the space for their interaction, which also increases the efficiency of the production process.
Bibliography
- Fedulov V.I. Monitoring the working conditions of personnel as an element of anti-crisis management of an enterprise // Innovative science. 2016. No.
- Kuznetsova M.N. Monitoring of working conditions and dangerous and harmful factors at the enterprises of the regions of the Russian Federation // Bulletin of the Voronezh state university. Series: Economics and Management. 2012. No. 1. pp. 91-96.
- Vishnyakova V.A., Rudnev V.D. Formation and state regulation of the Russian labor market. Monograph. - M.: Dashkov and K. - 156 p.
- Bershedova L.I., Rychikhina E.N. Socio-psychological foundations of the personnel monitoring system // System sociology and psychology. 2013. No. 8. pp. 25-29.
- Month V.A. Monitoring the innovative potential of enterprise personnel // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Herzen. 2008. No. 76-1.
- Kraev V.M., Tikhonov A.I.
